![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2007 
				Location: Germany, Dortmund 
				
				
					Posts: 9,415
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
      Regards, Detlef  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,085
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The cenangan form is scarce. I suspect it is a pretty recent form, and a development and simplification of the gerantim form. 
		
		
		
			The two cenangan in Harley's link are recent, and the only photos I could find of cenangan hilts are also over-blown recent ones. Essentially, the cenangan is the gerantim without the sprout on top. Pictured is a gerantim --- with sprout--- and the same hilt with the sprout painted out, which makes it a cenangan. Ben, this would be an easy hilt for you to use as a model:- reduce the raised parts that I commented on previously, and give them a bit of a curve, and you've just about done the job. The checkering is not necessary, this is the only Bali hilt I've seen that had checkering. Re the wood:- yes, it is jati gembol.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: Nederland 
				
				
					Posts: 83
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I am glad I'm not the only one that couldn't find it  
		
		
		
			  Yes the gerantim is close to what i have now, and the rest is easy to adjust. But now I know what it looks like, i have found this picture, is that the cenangan?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,085
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes, but modern and not particularly good quality.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: Nederland 
				
				
					Posts: 83
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 If not i am going for the gerantim. Thanks Mr Maisey.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2006 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,085
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			No, gerantim was not more common on Lombok. In past times it was a hilt normally used by the nobility of Bali, most especially in the form which was wrapped with woven gold. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Ben, you cannot convert your present almost cenangan into a gerantim, because then the proportions will definitely be wrong. If you want to do gerantim you'll need to start again and take account of the sprout on top, however, a gerantim out of plain wood seems to me to just a little unfitting. You could bind what you have with twine and have a loncengan, but although these are not out of place on Bali, they were more common on Lombok. Or you can slightly modify what you have a finish up with a pretty acceptable cenangan.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2011 
				Location: Nederland 
				
				
					Posts: 83
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I am sorry Mr Maisey, but i meant the gerantim that you adjusted, without the sprout, and there was my mistake, then is was a cenangan  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	  Maybe i start again with a new one, and make the top, middle, en bottom apart, that way i always can change the proportions, and i think it's nicer with a difference in grain. But we'll see. regards, Ben  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |