Indian sword for ID

[Jim McDougall]

I think a glance into Rawson and Egerton will show this type sword corresponding to iconographic styles and most likely from Deccan to southern India, and these as I had noted seem largely in a 'revival' sense representing the flamboyant forms of historic earlier times.
Naturally, these are for visual effect and undulating or serpentine blades do not offer particularly any notable advantage in actual combative use, but most likely disadvantage in that regard. The idea of weapons for specific purpose such as 'hamstringing' etc.based on blade shapes is of course not in my opinion feasible but sounds interesting.
Weapons intended for ceremonial, processional or rituals (not necessarily sacrificial) are inclined to promote dramatic effect, and references to such weapons being held in front of participating individuals in a bearing type position suggest these kinds of purposeful display.

[katana]

Hi Jim ,
we had a interesting sword posted by Ariel a while ago.... which seemed to be specifically aimed at injurying horses and was a common tactic employed in battle.

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ight=hamstring

All the best
David

[VANDOO]

HERE ARE A COUPLE ALONG THE SAME LINES. THE SPLIT TIP ON ONE MAKES IT A ZULFIKAR FORM

[ariel]

Originally Posted by VANDOO

HERE ARE A COUPLE ALONG THE SAME LINES. THE SPLIT TIP ON ONE MAKES IT A ZULFIKAR FORM

Interestingly, both have Kaudi.... Nepal, Bengal?

[DaveA]

Originally Posted by VANDOO

HERE ARE A COUPLE ALONG THE SAME LINES. THE SPLIT TIP ON ONE MAKES IT A ZULFIKAR FORM

I have recently seen a strongly recurved (I mean strongly, like an S ) zulfikar similar to these examples, with a partially (intermittently) serrated blade and tulwar-like hilt. The split blades are more separated. So sorry not to have a picture to post at this time. It was amazing to hold and I have no doubt it would be a formidable weapon if needed, but still … very odd! The dealer wants a <<cough>> $$$$ price for it and I'm tempted based on my own fascination with the type. What do my friends here on the forum have to say regarding relative scarcity of the type? Ethnographic interest and significance? Anything that is a mystery is especially interesting to me.

I thank you in advance for your comments.

Best Regards,

Dave A.

[ariel]

Originally Posted by katana

Hi Jim ,
we had a interesting sword posted by Ariel a while ago.... which seemed to be specifically aimed at injurying horses and was a common tactic employed in battle.

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ight=hamstring

All the best
David

Yes, I remember it. Artzi restored it a bit and currently it is in a collection in Israel, recently published in a "private collection book". It appears to be Spanish.
Still, battle is such an intense environment, that carrying different, very heavy and unwieldy weapons for a specific task that may or may not occur .... doesn't sound like a great idea.
Remember Monty Python's How To Defend Yourself Against A Man Armed With A Banana ( cucumber, asparagus etc)?

[Jim McDougall]

Originally Posted by katana

Hi Jim ,
we had a interesting sword posted by Ariel a while ago.... which seemed to be specifically aimed at injurying horses and was a common tactic employed in battle.

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ight=hamstring

All the best
David

Hi David,
I had forgotten all about that thing! It was an anomaly to be sure, and certainly not commonly seen features on a blade for cavalry or for that matter any military purpose I can think of. While the terrible practice of deliberately incapacitating horses was certainly something done in the throes of combat, it was accomplished with conventional weapons, not specifically designed 'tools' as far as I know.

I recall when I first saw this, the curiously angled distal part of the blade and the serpentine section above it really defy all practicality toward combat use as far as I could see. Interestingly the blade profile did in degree remind me of the Nayar temple sword types as well as the earlier Barabadur type mentioned in my previous post (Rawson).

Since there seem to be at least two of these seemingly fanciful weapons, it would be interesting if anyone could present more on what these might have been intended for. Obviously the military was not likely to have weapons for the ritual type situations we are discussing, but perhaps these might have been implements for foragers, such as sickle type use to harvest fodder for the horses. It seems few references focused on cavalry attend to the more mundane aspects in campaigns, but it seems this idea for such a 'weapon'.

All the best,
Jim

[eftihis]

Hi, here is another of the "zulfikar" variation, i once had in my collection.

[ariel]

Guys, the pattern seems to be wider than I thought

Perhaps, it is not an anomaly and, based on the sturdiness of the blades, not a parade one as well.
Most importantly, the Dhu-l-Faqar samples absolutely negate Hindu sacrificial function.

[Stan S.]

I still think the incurved mid-section of the blade could indicate a sacrifical purpose. It ofcourse could be juts a random feature but to me it looks like something well suited to fit cattle's neck. The blade being sharp is another indication of this theory. Are there any nicks to the edge that could be a result of an actual usage? If so, what part of teh blade is nicked?

[Jim McDougall]

It is always tempting and often compelling to attempt to explain unusual or even somewhat fanciful designs in ethnographic edged weapons blades, and as described by Christopher Spring in his "African Arms and Armour" the West typically has the need to find such explanations in these unusual ethnographic forms.

Much of this phenomenon has of course evolved from the countless 'exotic' weapons brought back from colonial campaigns and international expansion in recent centuries. It seems that many catalog descriptions seen through the years have developed an almost cliche' pattern of assigning terms such as 'executioners' or 'sacrificial' to many weapons with dramatically exaggerated features in the blade size or shape.

Examples of this can be seen in the often dramatic and almost fanciful blades on many African edged weapons; in the frightening choppers and arms brought out in volume after the Boxer Rebellion in China; and of course many other instances from many other cultures. Much of the romanticized and flowery descriptions in narratives and literature of Victorian times (which gave us fanciful terms like 'scimitar') also were often the foundation for 'collectors terms' with most of these evolving through transliteration and base misunderstanding by writers and perpetuated by thier readers.

In my perception, many ethnographic weapon and particularly blade forms derive from iconographic sources. Many of these are quite ancient and in friezes or sculptures such as described in India, and appear to be in many cases to have profoundly influenced many of these blade forms . These are typically depictive of intense mythological dramas in the heritage of the Hindu Faith, and may be of course considered interpretive in some degree , with these blade forms perhaps illustrated in accord with thier portrayal suitably emphasized in form.
In most cases it is considered that these are keenly accurate, however some of the more dramatic blade forms apparantly suggesting use in combat defy understanding of their actual practicality. Many of these forms said to have been used by the Nayar warriors have become the votive forms used in Temple rituals, and produced in accord with these early forms. The forward curves and dramatically shaped blades on these are votive and presumably used processionally, often with jingles and other apotropaic devices or motif added.

Unless we find evidence of one of these used in the actual Karma Kanda application in Vedic ritual, as we have with examples of the kora, kukri and ram dao in Bengal, Nepal regions, I feel this type weapon is distinctly representative of traditional Indian forms as described.