![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
Quote:
![]() Thanks, thats very interesting. The ferrule is pretty ugly too. Ahh, I see what you mean about the mounts. Would you strip the dark 'stain' off and reveal the wood? What date would you put on the blade? Best Gene |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
A blade like this, IMO, is 19th I would guess,*only* a guess tho .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
Quote:
Thanks Gene |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,462
|
Hi Gene,
Indeed a very different pommel..but it looks old though. I also agree that the windings and the ferrule (is it damar?) are latter. The scabbard I would leave it in the condition it is now. If you remove the dark stain, you probably will get a very "naked" scabbard.... Very different scabbardtip also.... I like the blade, and it looks old to me. Can you see if the elephanttrunk has broken off in the past? Kind Regards, Maurice |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,345
|
I agree with Maurice in keeping the dark stain/patina on the scabbard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
Thanks guys,
Sorry Maurice I don't know where the elephants trunk is? The pommel doesn't look to have been broken at any time, is that the elephants head? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Normally this "trunk" is a bit longer as on yours? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
Quote:
Doesn't seem any rougher than the rest, but there is certainly wear to the blade so possibly longer once I guess? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|