|  | 
|  | 
|  21st April 2011, 04:57 PM | #1 | 
| Member Join Date: Feb 2011 
					Posts: 27
				 |   
			
			late Qing Dynasty Chinese jian for sure
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  21st April 2011, 09:29 PM | #2 | |
| Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Kernersville, NC, USA 
					Posts: 793
				 |   Quote: 
 Steve | |
|   |   | 
|  21st April 2011, 10:07 PM | #3 | 
| Member Join Date: Mar 2007 
					Posts: 407
				 |   
			
			So it is just a catalogue error.  A jian could have made it into the hands of a colonist but it could not have traveled back in time from the late Qing (~1900) to the time of the Revolution.      Josh | 
|   |   | 
|  22nd April 2011, 03:44 AM | #4 | |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2006 
					Posts: 608
				 |   Quote: 
 You obviously have never seen the Chinese historical epic Crouching Tiger, Hidden Flux Capacitor. | |
|   |   | 
|  22nd April 2011, 05:57 PM | #5 | |
| Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 
					Posts: 10,660
				 |   Quote: 
 JUDL!!!! Chris, you are the absolute best! Fell outa my chair on that one  Thank you. Very well observed Josh, and Koto I apologize for not noting your well placed and obviously most important observation. It would seem Steve that your reference to Confederate use was actually quite a Freudian slip and not misspoken at all  Returning to my alternate scenario with possible use in the Civil War period of an obviously trade grade weapon from China, the Qing period of course was officially considered until 1911. The China clippers bringing such items back in the mid 19th century into the American ports of course presents a means for arrival of the weapon in this country. Naturally these scenarios are nothing more than positive speculation and exercising the historical detection paradigm which I thought would be interesting, but this indeed may be a blatant misteake in display as originally presumed  All best regards, Jim | |
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |