![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() You outbid me on this one! Well, some deep breathing and I am (almost) calm.... As a rule, kattaras have very thin and "whippy" blades; I had a feeling that this one might be a bot "stabler" than usual. Am I right? As to the "wolf-mark" it looks absoltely real, but the location is strange: in the middle of the blade. Usually, those were stamped on the ricasso... Would not be surprised if it was a locally-made blade (which is even better from my point of view!). Enjoy it! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 176
|
![]()
Although Im no expert at this, I would give my amature feeling. Kattaras seem so light, so "fragile" if you know what I mean. As apposed to a European or medieval Islamic broadsword, they seem as if they would shatter or break apart after some light sparring.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
![]()
Thanks, I did think about the mark's location.
Concerning fragility - I would not say so about this blade. I've seen kattaras only on photographs, so I can't make an opinion, but this blade, while quite light, nevertheless seems sturdy enough. It's quite thick in the middle, however may be a little bit lighter than similar european blades. The sword has a total mass of 950 gramms (give or take). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|