![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 306
|
Hi all!
After hearing this I whould say that sounds most likely. I never looked at the grip as the defining point before. Instead I spent hours reading and re-reading books and text on te internet as well as studing pictures until 11:00 at night with a head ache! ( my eye docter says I should cut back on my reading! ). Thanks for all the help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
What would you call this one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
Quote:
Maybe a khanjar? Lew |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 306
|
Hi Jens!
Very nice, I am filled with envy! I might be wrong but this looks to be a khanjarli dagger from India or some sort of khanjar. Nice gold work on it, is it a wootz blade? Hopefully this chould be of some help.Maah as-salaama! (good-bye in arabic)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 580
|
Jens,
I would call it a drop dead gorgeous pesh kabz. That is the most beautiful recurved dagger I have ever seen. It's more deeply recurved than the one on pg 494 of Stone's but the general look is the same. Lew, I don't believe it's a khanjar. None of the blades so named in Stone's (pg 353) show a T-rib. On the other hand, I believe khanjar just means knife so there might be T-rib versions. Aurangzeb, If Stone is to be believed on pgs 352 and 354, the khanjarli is a double edged recurved dagger with a large lunette pommel. Sincerely, RobT |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
Karud , Pesh , Choora ?
And why ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Aurangzeb, the one I showed is not a Khanjarli, it looks like this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
BTW, I have asked a dozen afghan antique dealers and none have heard of the term "choora". But then again, they were city folk from Kabul........ |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|