![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,347
|
![]()
Well , I think I have said about all that I can on this subject .
In parting I do have a comment on this link : http://www.symbiosys.nl/wink/E_noframes.html I strongly believe that the Balinese Ganesha carvings offered here and at other sites such as Novica have been carved to accomodate Western tastes and as such are a departure from traditional Balinese carving . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Rick, I am out too, but I have a last comment. You may be right about the Balinese carving tradition on these figures, but what I was more interested in was the iconography, not the carving technique.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,347
|
![]() Quote:
The figures in the links presented lack the typical Balinese embellishments as are seen on the keris handles we have discussed ; so I see them as not really Balinese in nature . ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,449
|
![]()
Recently finished on eBay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7332028583 Seems to be a somewhat more conventional representation with respect to the trunk, although the hand postures are atypical. This one does not strike me as being very old. Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|