![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
![]()
Ummm, old epee blade?
Best, F |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Hi Manolete,
Your pictures are getting finer ![]() I think i see these being called "thee sided" or "triangular section" blades in a determined reknown British catalogue, but i can't check whether their backs are flat or concave ![]() But i'd say we call it here "lamina de tres quinas e mesas concavas". ... Pick up your notions of galego ![]() I guess in French would be called "lame à deux pans creux". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
You are surely jesting, my good sir.
Oh, you indeed were? Well Senhor, what can you expect from small croppings of crappy large old pictures? : P Nah, the problem wit the denomination you suggest is that it is not distinctive enough, since it may well be applied also to estoc pyramidal crosscut blades ( like most socket bayonets). The "Three corners and concave tables" is much better, yet too lengthy to be practical. Yet both it and the French "blade with two hollow sides" do not address the counterpart face with the valley/central depression. (Not really a groove). This type of blade is very attractive, delicate, even elegant. Circa early to Mid17th C. It doths remind me of a leaf and it's stem. Seems to be a link between former broad blades and colichemarde pyramidal hollow blades. Surely, there must be many more around with this typology. What do you say, mes sieurs? Bestest Regards Manolo Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Better photos recently taken. Note that the reverse face is actually a valley made by the two mesas/tables/sides of the anverse. Not the typical third face of a pyramidal blade. The effect is very elegant, almost dainty, yet the 3 cm wide blade (at ricasso) is very robust.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
I would say i have already seen this type of cross section, in a much smaller scale; in fact the short blade of a sword cane i had.
If we were talking graphics, this would be a circumflex accent cross section ![]() Go figure what would they call this profile sword wise ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,477
|
![]()
In the 18th century these smallsword type blades were called 'hollow blades'.
(Aylward, 1945, p. 38) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi Guys,
Jim, I mean no disrespect, just trying to learn. But, weren't "hollow" blades _any_ blade with concave faces/mesas such as a triangular cross-cut (cc) estoc blade..? Many swedish palasch blades were of hollow diamond cc. Best M Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
You are bad...
Keep missbehavin' & Santa is going to also leave you only coal. : ) Regards M Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|