![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
Nice hilts Kai Wee. I am not prepared to argue either way if this figure is meant to be garuda or not, but i do feel fairly certain that this example of mine is meant to be the very same character as the last few you have shown yet the nose is not nearly as prominent as to be described as a beak.
![]() They also lack what seems to be included in most depictions of garuda that i have seen, some kind of wings, either obvious or stylized. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
Which is where these pictures of statues in Jkt's National Museum comes in handy...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
2 more.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 238
|
![]()
This always an interesting subject, but I think not as simple.
Other than Garuda, Bhima or Yaksha, Gandharva and Vanaspati seems to be other figure worth to mention (the last two are quite popular in Javanese tale). When relate further north (Sumatra/Peninsula Malaysia), as well as Bugis hilt, I sometime thought they depict Islam influence (salah/sholat position like ruku etc) as Islam seems to spread quite early in these areas. Probably also Western/handgun influence although I'm not sure how early it was seen by people in Nusantara. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|