![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
i agree (with everything
![]() the topkapi examples are about as good as they get. the decoration is all of a particular style, and possibly redone on to the older blades. the hilts were replaced and redressed as the originals were rotten or missing. i believe yucel (from memory) was the one that described a hilt on a blade (from his first visit), which was missing by the time he published his book and done the in depth research. the dates of these blades were all of a much older period, but neither stocklein, yucel, zaky or alexander (all well respected and had full access to the armoury) committed to anything past speculation on the dating. the hilts were easier as the court dress, artistic style and decoration was recorded during the post medieval times. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 222
|
![]() Quote:
![]() What about the sword you posted from the Armeria Reale, is there a date or place of origin listed for that one? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|