![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russia, Leningrad
Posts: 355
|
![]()
Hallow, Michael! Thank you for sharing this. I have not seen this picture before. In which manuscript it is?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russia, Leningrad
Posts: 355
|
![]()
it seems that we can see the matchcords which is hanging on the fingers:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Hello, Alexender,
In Koch's book which I cited in full it sadly just says 'British Library', without mentioning the manuscript. So: sorry. ![]() Honestly, I do not believe that the items you encircled are actual lengths of matchcord. If you look at the sources I posted at the beginning, on top of this thread, you will notice that 15th and early 16th c. matchcords were much thicker than these seem to be. Best, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russia, Leningrad
Posts: 355
|
![]()
Hallo, dear Michael.Thanks for answear. May be You are right, but the image is too arbitrary, imprecise and sketchy. So everything is possible ...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Absolutely, Alexender!
![]() ![]() m |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russia, Leningrad
Posts: 355
|
![]()
From Karls picasaweb: http://picasaweb.google.com/karl.perron
there are mistake in the title of authors photos. I think that it is a late 15 century but not a late 14 century ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Spiridonov; 14th November 2010 at 10:17 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bavaria, Germany - the center of 15th and 16th century gunmaking
Posts: 4,310
|
![]()
Brilliant, Alexander,
![]() Thanks a lot for sharing these! And: you're right of course, these are can be dated to ca. 1470-80. Best, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|