![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
I suspect I have the answer. It's a defensive weapon. It's not designed to kill, but to deter.
And the reason may be religious. In a land that believes in karma, killing is the ultimate no-no. Maybe this is carried by people with religious convictions. It may be a woman's self-defense tool. Not all weapons are designed to inflict fatality. I recently posted an aboriginal weapon that was only designed to wound (see Kangaroo Tooth Lacerator thread). Also, if memory serves me well, I think there are a multitude of Indian weapons that are designed to deter rather than kill. I think of Tiger's Claws, in particular. Perhaps others more knowledgeable in this area can expand. That's what I think, anyway. It's a defensive weapon. Carried by people who don't want to kill potential attackers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
OOPS!!
THESE HORNS ARE NOT FROM A BLACKBUCK THEY COULD BE FROM ANOTHER IN THE ANTELOPE FAMILY BUT ARE MORE LIKELY FROM THE GAZELLE FAMILY. A POSSIBILITY IS THE INDIAN GAZELL (GAZELLA BENNETTII) BUT THERE ARE SEVERAL POSSIBILITYS THE BLACKBUCK HAS A SPIRAL HORN LIKE THE KUDU SO IS ELIMINATED. THE HORNS COULD HAVE COME FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY AND NOT INDIA AND COULD BE FROM THE MIDDLE EAST OR AFRICA. I HAVE SEEN SIMULAR METALWORK ON TIGER SKULL SMOKING SETS MADE IN INDIA IN THE PAST WHEN TIGERS WERE NOT PROTECTED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 334
|
Quote:
If you look again upon the blades you'll see that at first glance they appear as Moroccan Kumiyah style, but actualy I think they were made to accomodate this special dagger, as one is a mirror-image of the other, each one pose a sharp longer edge outside. Nesher? This is 15 minutes driving from where I live... didn't realise there is a source for interesting things
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Nice example of unique craftsmanship.
My thoughts, I feel it is supposed to appear as a powder horn but conceals a blade. Gav |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
My fakir's horns, just for the record.
I believe these may be blackbuck. But not particularly black nonetheless. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
Beautiful, fascinating and most certainly deadly if properly applied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
|
Ron,
I vote defensive, too. Your Fakirs horns are likely from the same species. I was joking about the back scratchers, I'll be sure to add a smiley next time. Broad axe, I'm still leaning toward Kumyah for blade shape, all Indian double Bichwas I can find have a diamond profiles. The closest design comparisons are Moroccan influenced. Even their Henna art is similar. The patterns/symbols on the horn hilt surely have a meaning other than just a free form design. The designs overall don't depict any flowers a commonly seen in Indian works. Whoever, worked out the blade to natural horn adjustments alone has my admiration. Thank you all for your interest and comments, Steve |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|