![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
I cann't get rid of the idea this one is Phillipine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
It's tempting to do so Henk .
Me, I'm just not sure . The blade looks like it has been ritually washed a few times . I'm seeing a topographic surface on this blade . |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,209
|
I can imagine Rick. You mentioned before you see pamor on the blade. I tried to discover if i could see the same, maybe it is pamor indeed but i thought it were more forging lines of folding of the metal during forging. I also see some rustspurs. Only in the middle of the blade i see something, but in my opinion that is more twistcore. The blade is in my opinion more comparable with a Moro Budiak.
I cann't see the spurs of ritual washing of this blade on the pics. For me this is a blade i have to hold in my hands to give a good comment. Fact is it is a beauty and very nice to discuss. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
I'm pretty sure, the larger one is not Moro - the flow of lines doesn't seem to fit...
Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,237
|
Quote:
The hexagonal base makes me think of Atjeh. same as the outer line of the blade. The tang is a problem. Normally Atjeh or Sumatra spears have a round tappering tang with a twist near the end. and not this square type without the twist. Maybe some mix bewteen Nias and Sumatra/ Atjeh influences ? I have another strange spearhead for discussion. Will open another thread in order not to confuse this one even more Best regards, Willem |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|