![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
I believe this is a recently made (or cobbled-together) sword.
Although it is difficult to glean much from the photos, the blade appears to be well made and may be older than the handle, scabbard and baldric. However, it is a common style still manufactured in modern Aranyik, and I would estimate it to be no older than second half of the 20th century. The "pommel" plug is something I've never seen before and, frankly, strikes me as a meaningless addition. Some previous owner did not like the look of the typical hole/concavity at the distal end of the handle, and decided it needed to be plugged. As Philip notes, it makes no sense whatsoever. The handle is either a replacement, or has otherwise been altered. The stonework was either done to increase the item's "curb appeal", or a prior owner decorated it for his own pleasure. I have owned several daab and dha decorated with semi-precious stones (low-grade rubies and, in one case, peridots), but never the type seen here. Finally, I would not really consider this to be a "Montagnard" sword. Could it have been made for or used by a member of that group of "hill tribes"? Certainly. However, this is a Thai blade, similar in style to the ubiquitous swords brought back with US servicemen from the Vietnam War, as mentioned by Philip. Thank you for sharing this with us. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 81
|
![]()
Thanks for the opinion chaps. Very unusual thing for sure, yep i agree looks like that brass plug was stuck in by a previous owner...you know what though i actually kinda like it, fits in well with the rest of the fittings
![]() for the price i paid im very happy with it. im getting a little collection of dha going now, these things are addictive :-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]() Quote:
Welcome to the "dhafia". ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,866
|
![]()
I want to take a step back from the cliff edge. I know we can all be a little trigger happy when we see something we have not seen before, bang bang what ever it is its dead now
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,866
|
![]()
I would like to see much better clear pictures to start with. Close ups. This part looks gilded? Less subject to wear. Does the cut hole for the blade look bodgy? The parts do fit very well. Could they have been made for the handle? reminds me of my bicycle parts handle Dha? I bet this is 1940s.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
Hi Tim. I probably wasn't clear about my thoughts on the stones--I've just never seen this type of work before on a dha. Didn't mean to insinuate this couldn't be local work, just that it was something unfamiliar to me. Were I to see this come to market, I would probably buy it for that very reason.
My primary point is that I believe strongly that the handle (including the decorative stones, wire work and "pommel plug") are later additions to an older blade. This isn't meant to impute some nefarious or fraudulent intent upon prior owners. Quite the contrary--many, many dha blades exhibit such modifications, particularly good quality blades. 1940's? Perhaps the blade. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 81
|
![]()
thanks for the input Gents. Will try and come up with some better pics, the camera isnt the greatest though. will post some more asap
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|