Scottish court sword?

Ron Anderson · 1st September 2010, 02:26 AM

HI Dmiitry

Thank you.

I fear you are right. I've just found this item on google - identical to my hilt (see below).

So this appears to be an exact replica of a Scottish small sword (the Auld Alliance – Scottish items often follow French styles). Which explains the thistles.

The owner of this sword and the masonic swords I mentioned was named Hogg – a Scottish family long connected with the freemasons.

I'd say it's a lot older than 30 years, however. The leather is old and brittle, broken in three places. The blade is heavily oxidised. It appears to be an old replica for a proud Scottish family. (A proud Scot - who'd have thought?)

http://www.antiques-arms.com/catalog...er-pi-429.html

Ron Anderson · 7th September 2010, 11:28 AM

Yesterday I took this sword back to the man I bought it from and swapped it for a masonic sword. A horrible recently-made sword (it has a gauche Toledo blade and a yellow plastic handle under the wire on the grip.)

I don't even like masonic swords. But really - for me a poor piece of authenticity of any kind is better than a quality fake.

This guy is an old man who doesn't generally deal in swords and for some reason yesterday he suddenly remembered where they had come from – a ballet company.

So Jim was right. It was a theatrical item. A very well made one. I suspect made in the later 19th or early 20th century, and probably by a real sword maker. Certainly, the scabbard seemed authentic. This was not a contemporary re-enactment piece.

You don't find many old replicas - not here in Australia.

End of story. You live and learn.

laEspadaAncha · 26th September 2010, 07:33 AM

Kind of late to the game in responding to this thread, but... in Wither's self-published World Swords, he shows this very similar pattern hilt (actually twice) in his smallswords section and attributes it to ca. 1760 (and later to ca. 1800). Cutlers often had established pattern numbers from manufacturers they offered to their customers, such as those Bezdek shows on pgs. 269-273 in his book on English (and Scottish) sword makers. It would seem reasonable that some patterns (such as this Rococo pattern) would have been more popular than others, whether it be for stylistic or cost reasons, the latter which would have been impacted by the use of cast hilts to meet the demand at the time. After all, what 18th C. gentleman worth his weight would be caught without his smallsword?

Jim McDougall · 26th September 2010, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by laEspadaAncha

Kind of late to the game in responding to this thread, but... in Wither's self-published World Swords, he shows this very similar pattern hilt (actually twice) in his smallswords section and attributes it to ca. 1760 (and later to ca. 1800). Cutlers often had established pattern numbers from manufacturers they offered to their customers, such as those Bezdek shows on pgs. 269-273 in his book on English (and Scottish) sword makers. It would seem reasonable that some patterns (such as this Rococo pattern) would have been more popular than others, whether it be for stylistic or cost reasons, the latter which would have been impacted by the use of cast hilts to meet the demand at the time. After all, what 18th C. gentleman worth his weight would be caught without his smallsword?

Nicely researched Chris, and well made points on the social importance of smallswords in the 18th century. It is quite true that all this fashion did call for a great degree of selection in the styles befitting the gentleman, and the cutlers did thier best to accomodate by cataloguing various styles and features to order. Many of these pattern books have been the mainstay of the esoteric quest for smallsword research, and would have possibly even been known to theatrical outfitters.

Ron thank you for the kind note on my suggestion, and in my opinion even these kinds of weapons have thier own degree of novelty niche'. I recall interesting stories and even movies about the mid to latter 19th century travelling theatrical troupes, which had a history all thier own, as they portrayed classical and historical themes. I would guess that the unusually rounded tip on the blade would have prevented any accidental cuts on stage.

All best regards,
Jim

Ron Anderson · 26th September 2010, 08:30 AM

Hi, Jim.

Indeed, the rounded tip was no doubt useful. Good ballet dancers are hard to replace.

On that point, there were several small indentations and marks all the way along the sword, as if it had been used in a mock sword fight. These only made sense when I realised it was a theatrical sword.

Certainly, it made no sense at all when I thought it might be a court or masonic sword.

Interesting, because I've not seen those kinds of marks on any real swords. And it just goes to show the way people imagine the way that swords are fought with is probably quite different from the way they were employed in a real life fight.

No doubt the actors/dancers here engaged in a lot of knocking swords together and prancing around on stage, and very little true cut and thrust.

Jim McDougall · 26th September 2010, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Anderson

Hi, Jim.

Indeed, the rounded tip was no doubt useful. Good ballet dancers are hard to replace.

On that point, there were several small indentations and marks all the way along the sword, as if it had been used in a mock sword fight. These only made sense when I realised it was a theatrical sword.

Certainly, it made no sense at all when I thought it might be a court or masonic sword.

Interesting, because I've not seen those kinds of marks on any real swords. And it just goes to show the way people imagine the way that swords are fought with is probably quite different from the way they were employed in a real life fight.

No doubt the actors/dancers here engaged in a lot of knocking swords together and prancing around on stage, and very little true cut and thrust.

Hi Ron,
Absolutely, and it does seem almost comical in a sense when we think of those staged combats as they must have appeared in todays terms, but at the time they must have well carried the theme of the production. Those very same theatrics were of course the ancestors of the wonderful old classic films with Fairbanks and Flynn, the swashbuckling action, and the very cause of my lifelong affliction with the study of swords and arms.

I recall there was a course offered in college at one time that was indeed called 'Stage Combat', and was a fencing course attuned to using actual fencing technique in somewhat exaggerated sense as would be expected.
I believe the 'tutus' were optional

All the best,
Jim

1st September 2010, 02:26 AM	#1
Ron Anderson Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Sydney Australia Posts: 228	HI Dmiitry Thank you. I fear you are right. I've just found this item on google - identical to my hilt (see below). So this appears to be an exact replica of a Scottish small sword (the Auld Alliance – Scottish items often follow French styles). Which explains the thistles. The owner of this sword and the masonic swords I mentioned was named Hogg – a Scottish family long connected with the freemasons. I'd say it's a lot older than 30 years, however. The leather is old and brittle, broken in three places. The blade is heavily oxidised. It appears to be an old replica for a proud Scottish family. (A proud Scot - who'd have thought?) http://www.antiques-arms.com/catalog...er-pi-429.html

7th September 2010, 11:28 AM	#2
Ron Anderson Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Sydney Australia Posts: 228	Yesterday I took this sword back to the man I bought it from and swapped it for a masonic sword. A horrible recently-made sword (it has a gauche Toledo blade and a yellow plastic handle under the wire on the grip.) I don't even like masonic swords. But really - for me a poor piece of authenticity of any kind is better than a quality fake. This guy is an old man who doesn't generally deal in swords and for some reason yesterday he suddenly remembered where they had come from – a ballet company. So Jim was right. It was a theatrical item. A very well made one. I suspect made in the later 19th or early 20th century, and probably by a real sword maker. Certainly, the scabbard seemed authentic. This was not a contemporary re-enactment piece. You don't find many old replicas - not here in Australia. End of story. You live and learn.

26th September 2010, 07:33 AM	#3
laEspadaAncha Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 608	Kind of late to the game in responding to this thread, but... in Wither's self-published World Swords, he shows this very similar pattern hilt (actually twice) in his smallswords section and attributes it to ca. 1760 (and later to ca. 1800). Cutlers often had established pattern numbers from manufacturers they offered to their customers, such as those Bezdek shows on pgs. 269-273 in his book on English (and Scottish) sword makers. It would seem reasonable that some patterns (such as this Rococo pattern) would have been more popular than others, whether it be for stylistic or cost reasons, the latter which would have been impacted by the use of cast hilts to meet the demand at the time. After all, what 18th C. gentleman worth his weight would be caught without his smallsword?

26th September 2010, 08:30 AM	#5
Ron Anderson Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Sydney Australia Posts: 228	Hi, Jim. Indeed, the rounded tip was no doubt useful. Good ballet dancers are hard to replace. On that point, there were several small indentations and marks all the way along the sword, as if it had been used in a mock sword fight. These only made sense when I realised it was a theatrical sword. Certainly, it made no sense at all when I thought it might be a court or masonic sword. Interesting, because I've not seen those kinds of marks on any real swords. And it just goes to show the way people imagine the way that swords are fought with is probably quite different from the way they were employed in a real life fight. No doubt the actors/dancers here engaged in a lot of knocking swords together and prancing around on stage, and very little true cut and thrust.