![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
Hi Dmitry
The item is in storage currently and unfortunately I don't have a photo. However, it is certainly not from WW2. It is an early 19th century briquet - this is blatantly obvious from both its condition and its patina. It matches the Russian 1817 model briquet exactly. Which doesn't surprise me, because that is what it was described as when I bought it. I have been collecting swords for 25 years and I know the difference between a ww2 sword and a sword from the early to mid 19th century. This sword is the Russian pattern. That doesn't necessarily mean it was manufactured in Russia. It could have been made in Solingen, and the US certainly imported swords from there. However, there is no such marking to confirm one way or another. Ron |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
![]()
Is that it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
Yes, that it is it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
Correction, no that is not it.
Mine has a flat blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
The blade of my sword has darkened with age. Otherwise, yes - the hilts are similar.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
Well Dmitry
It appears you are right and I am wrong. I will check my sword again. I am surprised. The sword appeared to be much much older. Regards Ron |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|