|  | 
|  | 
|  23rd June 2010, 06:49 AM | #1 | 
| Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: The Netherlands 
					Posts: 2,237
				 |   
			
			Hello Dmitry, So these trade blades maintained the broad fuller ? | 
|   |   | 
|  23rd June 2010, 01:14 PM | #2 | 
| Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: The Netherlands 
					Posts: 1,209
				 |   
			
			Looks like a Rudus. Blade could be from a klewang and for the purpose a reshaped tip. Nice oddity.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  23rd June 2010, 04:42 PM | #3 | |
| Member Join Date: Jul 2009 
					Posts: 607
				 |   Quote: 
 In this case the shape of the blade doesn't comply with its apparent age, imho. For instance, look at the British-made blades made for the Ethiopian trade. They look like the British Napoleonic period blades, but were made well into the 1900s. | |
|   |   | 
|  30th June 2010, 06:17 PM | #4 | 
| Member Join Date: Jun 2008 
					Posts: 227
				 |   
			
			...and Mole was still producing 1796 Light Cavalry Sabres for India into the 1880's...
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  1st July 2010, 04:55 AM | #5 | |
| Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 
					Posts: 10,654
				 |   Quote: 
 The Indian regiments maintained favor for the heavy blade of the M1796 light cavalry sabre, and many of these blades ended up in tulwar hilts. One of the most interesting records of the use of these M1796 sabre blades was I believe noted that the British troops in India were amazed at the effect of the swords used by Indian warriors, and horrified when they discovered thier swords carried old British light cavalry sabre blades. It was simply the way they were sharpened and kept well oiled in wooden scabbards, but the heavy blade was deadly when used correctly. | |
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |