![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Only "good" for my personal reasons, Tim--I wanted to compare your scabbard to some of mine.
I would argue strenuously that the use of found objects on these swords is definitely acceptible. Some of my most interesting dha have such additions. Also, it is not at all uncommon to find older blades remounted with newer fittings, or swords assembled from seemingly disparate component parts. I think your example is both interesting and worthy of discussion. I apologize if my prior comments led you to believe otherwise. Thank you for sharing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,925
|
I agree with you Andrew the line to the eye in the scabbard is not the sweetest but I can say that in the hand is really sweet. The bicycle parts have not just been sawn up and stuck on willy-nilly. A balance between blade and the handle has been found as in all good weapons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,925
|
I have the feeling the parts came from a back wheel, direct drive no gears. This picture is from a 1934 model. Not the right pieces, but the bits in question could be from an earlier model or perhaps a latter model.
http://oldbike.wordpress.com/1940s-h...watsonian-side |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|