![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,465
|
Sorry, the blade looks very Buginese to my eyes!?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,127
|
If it has the typical Bugis flat faces, yes, I'd agree, Bugis style, but I cannot see those flat faces in the photos, what I can see is a bold, very non-typical pamor, a long point to the blade and the stub of what would have been a small, spindly kembang kacang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,465
|
Yes, the blade shows a Bugis style but there are some unusual features, I agree.
The wrongko is as well somewhat unusual for Madura, the lata is straight by the example in question, by the examples shown from me not. The hole in the pangulu handle isn't unusual, see the pics of one of my pangulu hilts. Regards, Detlef |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,127
|
That blade could be Bugis Detlef, but from the photo I cannot see sufficient evidence to place it as Bugis, the indicators that I can see look more like East Jawa to me.
If in the hand it did provide sufficient evidence to classify as Bugis, I think I'd be considering Sumatera or some other place outside of Sulawesi. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 432
|
Hello,
Thank you all for your responses. I apologize for the delay in responding. Here are photos of the blade in its sheath. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,127
|
The form of the sirah cecak & the buntut urang is not typical of a keris that can be classified as Bugis, however, it is typical of a keris that can be classified as East Jawa or Madura.
If the blade does indeed carry flat faces, then we would need to consider the possibility of a gonjo replacement at some time in the (probably distant) past. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|