Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12th December 2022, 07:22 PM   #30
mahratt
Member
 
mahratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ariel View Post
And, BTW, I frown upon the use of the term “Khyber knife” in books and other professional publications.
First, this moniker was given to it by the Brits who did not know of, or did not care about, its real name.
Second, it implies that this weapon was endemic specifically to the Khyber Pass area. In fact, it was produced and used in other Afghani areas, in CA Khanates ( somewhere here there was a photo of a whole slew of them sold as butcher meat choppers), in India and (in a slightly modified form) even in Persia ( See Fiegel, #2095, 2096).

Interestingly, “ ch’hura” is more correct: it is a word with Sanscritic roots meaning a knife.
In formal publications the native term “ selava” is, IMHO, mandatory. It is its true local name and, having learned it, we are obligated to use it.

I take my hat of to Indonesian and Philippine gurus who are very careful, almost persnickety, about terminology.

Again, in informal exchanges we can call it whatever is convenient for the occasion.
I'm sorry. But your "frown" is your personal problem. There are a number of established terms for well-known armes items. These terms allow everyone to determine without any problems what kind of arms it is even without its detailed description.
The use of native ethnic names of weapons is a "nice bonus", especially considering that in the same Afghanistan in its different regions the same one Khyber knife has been called by many different names.
Nevertheless, I am very glad that you have learned useful information from my book on the arms of Afghanistan.

And for reference, Khyber knives have never been produced in the khanates of Central Asia.

With Indonesia and the Philippines - everything is easier. The huge variety of forms of tribal swords and daggers, common in relatively small areas, has led to the fact that it turned out to be easier to use traditional ethnic names.


However, I think that this topic is not about the nomenclature of weapons. And I think you should not "clutter up" with our discussion the topic that francantolin opened
mahratt is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.