28th June 2006, 02:06 AM | #1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,293
|
Age of This Piece ?
Is this piece antique ; i.e. 100 years old ?
Somehow this doesn't look like a real fighting piece . I would think that the attached tab would seriously hurt the hand if the katar was actually used . http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7424558672 |
28th June 2006, 02:18 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
This is certainly a newly made piece, identifiable by the stereotype damascus birdeye pattern, and the koftgari. However, it is nice
|
28th June 2006, 02:49 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
No doubt: very, very new...
But in the same vein: I always had doubts about the real use of the unfolding katars(you know, when you press the bars together, the blade opens up in 3 segments). The only solid blade (central) becomes totally hidden and useless. I suspect all of them started as 19th century bazaar pieces for the dumb "farangi". |
28th June 2006, 07:25 AM | #4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,204
|
Caveat emptor again ...
Rick and I talked by PM about this piece before it sold. We both thought the dating was off by a few centuries. Quite an attractive piece but not old. The price surprised me a little given the obvious newness of this one.
Ian. |
28th June 2006, 09:28 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
Very, very, very stereotipic modern kofgari and eyed damascus. Nicely made thou.
ehm, the price |
|
|