Not exactly related to kerises but...

Jussi M. · 9th June 2009, 02:38 PM

Greetings,

whilst this item is not exactly related to kerises I thought maybe this is the most appropriate place to put this thread(?) as it is kinda related (at least in my own mind) anyhow

Please let me explain.

I would like to display a keris in my study room. I have thought of placing it onto an appropriate ploncon. Whilst at it I thought I could make some changes to the room itself and though about placing this statue near the keris. - Whilst the tiger might not be the most look up upon animal on the Indonesian archipelago I like the statue, so...

I dont know the origins of this statue but I do know that it is at least a few decades old and most probably from somewhere Asia. - A broad description, yes, but unfortunately the best I can give. It is made of bronze; the size is apr. 100cm x 50cm x 30cm and unfortunately there are no markings whatsoever to be found anywhere.

As many of you are on the know about Asian art and craft I would kindly ask you to give your opinion on the origin and age of this statue. I dont have a clue but would like to know more. I´ve never seen anything like it before.

Thanks,

Jussi

Rick · 10th June 2009, 05:02 PM

I'd suggest Japanese, early to mid 20th C. Jussi .
Most of these are signed and very darkly patinated; that puzzles me a bit .

Lynx below,

http://www.jcollector.com/PhotoGalle...ctCode=JP9M819
http://www.jcollector.com/PhotoGalle...ctCode=JM8X172

drdavid · 10th June 2009, 11:47 PM

Hi Jussi
I'm with Rick on this, Meiji era Japanese would be my guess. Most but not all of these will be signed, usually on the bottom of the piece, but in some cases the signature will be tucked away almost disguised in the fur or similar. The lack of dark patina may be a function of overzealous cleaning.
cheers
David

A. G. Maisey · 11th June 2009, 02:57 AM

You blokes are better than me on this.

I expect to see Japanese bronzes with that beautiful dark patina. When I look at this one I am reminded of nothing so much as a some Russian and German woodcarvings I have seen --- actually I own the German one.To my eye, the execution just does not look like the Japanese bronzes I have seen.

For you to be able to see through the lack of patina and still feel confident with a Japanese origin beats me hands down.

Rick · 11th June 2009, 03:35 AM

No Alan, you have a very valid point .

I believe I spoke too soon; having one of the Japanese Bronzes myself . After some reflection I doubted my conclusion due to the abundant working of the surface of this sculpture to represent the coats of these animals .
That effect does not quite match the Japanese style of these tigers .

My bronze tiger is anatomically correct; the genitalia shown on this cub are quite exagerrated compared to my Japanese rendition of the adult Male.

I plead nolo .

A. G. Maisey · 11th June 2009, 04:43 AM

Rick, I'm not backing a German nor a Russian origin, I'm just saying it looks like some things of this origin I have seen.
I don't know enough about this sort of stuff to back anything.
As far as I'm concerned it could be from anywhere.

9th June 2009, 02:38 PM	#1
Jussi M. Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 235	Not exactly related to kerises but... Greetings, whilst this item is not exactly related to kerises I thought maybe this is the most appropriate place to put this thread(?) as it is kinda related (at least in my own mind) anyhow Please let me explain. I would like to display a keris in my study room. I have thought of placing it onto an appropriate ploncon. Whilst at it I thought I could make some changes to the room itself and though about placing this statue near the keris. - Whilst the tiger might not be the most look up upon animal on the Indonesian archipelago I like the statue, so... I dont know the origins of this statue but I do know that it is at least a few decades old and most probably from somewhere Asia. - A broad description, yes, but unfortunately the best I can give. It is made of bronze; the size is apr. 100cm x 50cm x 30cm and unfortunately there are no markings whatsoever to be found anywhere. As many of you are on the know about Asian art and craft I would kindly ask you to give your opinion on the origin and age of this statue. I dont have a clue but would like to know more. I´ve never seen anything like it before. Thanks, Jussi

10th June 2009, 05:02 PM	#2
Rick Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 6,293	A Guess I'd suggest Japanese, early to mid 20th C. Jussi . Most of these are signed and very darkly patinated; that puzzles me a bit . Lynx below, http://www.jcollector.com/PhotoGalle...ctCode=JP9M819 http://www.jcollector.com/PhotoGalle...ctCode=JM8X172

10th June 2009, 11:47 PM	#3
drdavid Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 371	Hi Jussi I'm with Rick on this, Meiji era Japanese would be my guess. Most but not all of these will be signed, usually on the bottom of the piece, but in some cases the signature will be tucked away almost disguised in the fur or similar. The lack of dark patina may be a function of overzealous cleaning. cheers David

11th June 2009, 02:57 AM	#4
A. G. Maisey Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,892	You blokes are better than me on this. I expect to see Japanese bronzes with that beautiful dark patina. When I look at this one I am reminded of nothing so much as a some Russian and German woodcarvings I have seen --- actually I own the German one.To my eye, the execution just does not look like the Japanese bronzes I have seen. For you to be able to see through the lack of patina and still feel confident with a Japanese origin beats me hands down.

11th June 2009, 03:35 AM	#5
Rick Vikingsword Staff Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 6,293	No Alan, you have a very valid point . I believe I spoke too soon; having one of the Japanese Bronzes myself . After some reflection I doubted my conclusion due to the abundant working of the surface of this sculpture to represent the coats of these animals . That effect does not quite match the Japanese style of these tigers . My bronze tiger is anatomically correct; the genitalia shown on this cub are quite exagerrated compared to my Japanese rendition of the adult Male. I plead nolo .

11th June 2009, 04:43 AM	#6
A. G. Maisey Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,892	Rick, I'm not backing a German nor a Russian origin, I'm just saying it looks like some things of this origin I have seen. I don't know enough about this sort of stuff to back anything. As far as I'm concerned it could be from anywhere.