25th April 2005, 01:04 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Georgian naval dagger?
This one just ended on e-bay.
The owner was told that it is a regulation dagger of thr Georgian Navy. I was very unsure about it. The owner asked me to post it here for your comments. The link: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWA%3AIT&rd=1 Last edited by ariel; 25th April 2005 at 05:24 AM. |
25th April 2005, 04:51 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
We need a pic or link, Ariel.
|
25th April 2005, 05:25 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
ooops....
But it is there now. |
25th April 2005, 05:49 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Pix from Ariel:
|
25th April 2005, 05:54 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Andrew,
Many thnks! |
25th April 2005, 06:21 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
So it's N87 from the year 1992... I've never seen georgian navy dirks before, but what bothers me is that there is a lot of work done on this one (number, year, leaves), but there is no georgian symbolics - there is no star, there is no Zhvania's three-colored flag, or more modern nationalistic templar's crosses. I don't see any naval symbolics either - no anchors, no ships etc.
Plus I don't really think that issuing new dirks was a great priority for the small georgian navy in 1992 - civil wars, mixed with genocide and occupation that followed, I don't see it's happening in 1992-1997. |
25th April 2005, 03:42 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
My concerns exactly...
Nevertheless, it looks like an excellent dagger with a lot of effort invested into it. Any thoughts on it's origin? |
|
|