![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 60
|
![]()
bonsoir a tous
I bought this hilt whis no blade on it in an antique store many years ago, is segond model briques of an xi I bieleve and all the proof like correct the writing say MODELE PAR A LA MANUFACTURE NATIONAL DARMES A VERSAILLE on the side BOUTET ENTREPRENEUR I like very mach have your comment regard jacques |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 668
|
![]()
Hello:
I called attention to the presence of two ways to record: with punches and hand engraving. I think the legends in italics have been added to give more value to the piece. In principle, I think that if the model year is 13, the National Manufacturing but would not Imperial. Surely, there is someone more qualified who knows the history of Boutet and manufacture of Versailles- Affectionately. Fernando K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
I agree with Fernando. While the Versailles stamp on the guard is consistant with weapons assembled at that armory, the briquet was probably one of the most common and voluminous sidearms known. Ironically the Versailles stamp alone identifying this as French would be sufficient as these briquets were used by virtually every European army.
Boutet was the director of the Versailles armory 1793-1818, and was known mostly for extremely high end firearms of presentation grade to the royal and imperial courts, so why such attention in engraving would be placed on a rank and file hanger is more than extremely unlikely in my opinion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 60
|
![]()
hello fernando hello jim
maybe is what wy can call a salesman sample?? peru is fantastic for collect strange sing regard jacques |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|