|
16th May 2009, 09:47 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France
Posts: 45
|
Algerian? Maroccan? dagger
|
16th May 2009, 10:21 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,741
|
Algerian in my humble opinion. Looks better than most I have seen.
Regards Stuart |
16th May 2009, 01:22 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
The date is 1883.
Gregorian date using Arabic numerals? Or, is it 1883 H, ie 2448 Gregorian? |
16th May 2009, 09:22 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France
Posts: 45
|
Christian kabyl or copte perhaps?
|
17th May 2009, 01:00 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
A Moroccan "wedding nimcha". Sometimes they have the smaller flyssa blades that were produced after the mid-19th century for "travellers".
The flyssa blades may have been produced by Kabyles at first, and then copied - with quality suffering greatly in my opinion - around Algeria and Morocco. The handle is based on the Moroccan nimcha, so I'm further inclined to say this is a Moroccan piece. This one is still far better than the "new" ones with blades stamped out of sheet metal. Cheers, Emanuel |
17th May 2009, 03:48 AM | #6 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
Quote:
I agree with you Manolo. This though is a very finely made example excellent materials and workmanship. Lew |
|
17th May 2009, 07:45 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
no way, because Copte are from East Africa, e.i. ; Egypt, Sudan, and even Ethiopia if Kabyl was, and are, for some of them, Christians, they aren't Coptic also, in Islamic countries, specially about Egypt, the Christians (none military) wasn't allowed to carry weapons in our case, I thing about a Berber short sword, mixup between; "flissa" and "nimcha" as well as mentionned Manolo, and Louis à + Dom |
|
|
|