Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 7th November 2008, 12:45 AM   #1
rand
Member
 
rand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 538
Default British service in India sword ?

Believe this is a British general officer sword, pattern 1822 for serice in India. Can anyone elaborate on it?


thanks,

rand
Attached Images
    
rand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 07:40 AM   #2
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,954
Default

Especially nice example Rand! This is indeed the pattern 1822 (known as the 'gothic hilt' ) with the cartouche enclosing Queen Victoria's royal cypher with the added 'I' for India. She was proclaimed Empress of India May 1,1876 so this hilt post dates that event, and was used until 1890's (the pattern 1895 supplanted this form hilt).
If we could get a close up of the six point star surrounding the brass proof disc we might get an idea of the outfitter, or if there are markings in the etched motif.
Weapons from the British Raj are extremely desirable, representing this colorful military heritage in India, and these officers swords with the VRI cartouche have always seemed rather rare in coming up for sale.

All the best,
Jim
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 08:03 AM   #3
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,741
Default

I may be wrong but I believe the Star of David surrounding the proof was used by Wilkinson.
Stu
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 01:52 PM   #4
rand
Member
 
rand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 538
Default

Hey Guys,

Thanks for your information. Hee is a photo of the mark, It says "Proved T."

Was interesting about the added "I" for India.....


rand
Attached Images
 
rand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 04:59 PM   #5
rand
Member
 
rand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 538
Default

Have been advised that this sword may be a copy and to check the discriminating general site which I have, the decoraion on the spine of the hilt is different. Not sure if hey make more than one copy or not. This sword has been hanging on the wall at my brothers house for over thirty years...

Would like your thoughts on if this may be a copy or not.

I do appreciate all opinions.....

rand
Attached Images
   

Last edited by rand; 7th November 2008 at 05:53 PM.
rand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 05:24 PM   #6
rand
Member
 
rand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 538
Default

Picture of copy made by "Discriminating General.....
Attached Images
 
rand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 07:02 PM   #7
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,653
Default

Hi Rand ,
here are pictures of another 1822 pattern with a similar 'back strap'.... but with a George IV catouche on the 'guard'

http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?im...%3Den%26sa%3DN

Is there a possibility that this is a P1845 Officer's Sword. Very nearly identical to the P1822. I understand that the difference being that the P1845 has a fullered "Wilkinson" blade instead of a pipe back blade ??

Regards David

Last edited by katana; 7th November 2008 at 07:13 PM.
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 07:11 PM   #8
Norman McCormick
Member
 
Norman McCormick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,598
Default

Hi,
I think that Rand's sword is an 1845 pattern with the 1854 variant hilt. The 1822 has a pipe back blade and a partially folding basket, the 1845 a single fullered spearpoint blade and the 1854 variant a fixed basket. There will always be exceptions but as far as I can remember this was the specifications as per the British Army.
Regards,
Norman.

Last edited by Norman McCormick; 7th November 2008 at 07:18 PM. Reason: Further Info.
Norman McCormick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 10:14 PM   #9
rand
Member
 
rand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 538
Default

Besides what pattern the sword is am now trying to find out if it is a copy or not. The threads I have read on this subject no longer have the photo's attached to reference. If you know a related thread reguarding to this proof mark or sword please post the link here..

thanks,
rand
rand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2008, 11:45 PM   #10
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,653
Default

Rand,
Robert Wilkinson-Latham mentions the 'proved T' mark in this thread....

http://forums.swordforum.com/showthread.php?t=87782

Regards
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2008, 06:20 AM   #11
rand
Member
 
rand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 538
Default

After reading other posts on British swords it seems likely this sword is a copy made over thirty years ago. Was surprised that they had made copies of this sword that long ago..... Was purchased just after the movie "Zulu Dawn" came out, if you have not seen it rent it. Thank you all for your input...

rand
rand is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.