![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello forumites!
This piece got me stumped: Blade with single bevel on the right hand side (left side flat except for a tiny bit of edge wear) - not with a broad chisel grind as in most Visayan blades though; full tang construction consistent with Luzon (influence). The horn hilt nicely carved with silver ferrule and silver pommel cap (both octagonal); tang peened over a brass disk; copper pin visible on both sides near ferrule (possibly securing the blade?). I seem to remember blades of similar profile being attributed to Bicol... Thanks for any comments/pointers! Regards, Kai -- Specs: sword length 564 mm (22.2") blade length 421 mm (16.6") max. blade width 39.3 mm (1.55"); at base max. 30.2 mm and min. 25.8 mm (1.19"/1.02") blade thickness: at base 5.85 mm (0.23"); 1/3rd 3.9 mm (0.15"); 2/3rd 3.3 mm (0.13") weight 504 g (1 lb 1.8 oz) POB 90 mm (= 331 mm from tip) -- Last edited by kai; 1st February 2019 at 06:58 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Here is a thread with another old piece with similar blade - different hilt though...
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?p=237387 Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
P.S.: Note the maker's mark(?) at the base of the blade (right hand side)!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 736
|
![]()
Beautiful blade! Do you know age aproximatelly? Thanks
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
I would put the blade as Tagalog, though some might argue that it is Ilokano.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 639
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]() HTML Code:
The sheath will be the deciding factor =) ![]() Best, Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Thanks Carlos!
Quote:
![]() Quote:
I believe there is a tendency to underestimate the age of Luzon blades with monosteel blades. Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Bringing over the info kindly provided in the other thread:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
Because of the overall styling and degree of craftsmanship shown (not only in the hilts carving) I would agree with your dating this piece to the end of the 19th century to early 20th century. Also as I forgot to mention earlier, the copper pin you ask about is most likely for decorative purposes only and that originally each individual flower both near the ferrule and butt cap would have held one.
Best, Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Robert,
Quote:
BTW, have you come across any similar "maker's mark" on Luzon blades? Quote:
It certainly would look neat and be more in line with the horn hilts decorated with pins of silver/etc.; a copper pin may also be too soft to really secure a blade... It just seemed odd to me that only these 2 pins survived though. Maybe I should get a x-ray done to put that idea to rest... ![]() Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
It would seem a bit redundant to have a single soft copper pin go through the tang (weakening it by drilling) when it already extends completely through the hilt and butt plate and is then peened to secure the blade.
![]() ![]() ![]() Best, Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello xasterix!
Quote:
Quote:
Any other examples that resemble this style, anyone? Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
For comparison, I'm adding a regular Luzon blade from possibly the same period; the hilt is the same type as in Robert's example while the blade has a symmetrical bevel (i. e. no chisel grind). [Please excuse the poor pic quality. I traded it with a forumite a long time ago.]
BTW, this common plain hilt type always seems to have 7 facets (which is also reflected in the ferrule). The ornately-carved hilt has an octagonal ferrule as well as pommel plate though; also the neighboring flowers number 8. Regards, Kai -- Specs: Length: 492 mm (19.4") Blade length: 334 mm (13.15") Blade max. width: 46 mm (1.81") Blade max. thickness: 8 mm (5/16") Hilt: 160 mm (6.3") weight: 598 g Last edited by kai; 3rd February 2019 at 11:15 PM. Reason: Adding specs... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Robert,
Quote:
Quote:
I'll report back when I manage to obtain sound results! Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
The final fitting the tang extends through before being peened looks a bit yellow in your photos as well, so you might want to have it checked at the same time as the pins.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Yes, will do, Robert!
Not keeping my breath though since this seems like a rather weird place for a soft metal. Thanks for sharing your thoughts though! Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,165
|
![]()
Hi Kai,
Just to throw another possibility into the mix. Chisel-edged blades were also made in Batangas, according to information provided a decade or more ago by our friend Zelbone. Finely carved horn hilts were also seen from there in the late 19th and early 20th C. Batangas is not far from Laguna de Pays, so I think that general area south of Manila is where your knife originated. I think you have a Tagalog knife with some Visayan influence in the blade, and Batangas is an area where that overlap can occur. Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
Ian I wondered about that influence myself.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
The 'peened tang' could be just a nail used to hold the pommel piece on, as is done on many khukuri. An x-ray would confirm or deny the tang type.
More cheaply, you might get some info by using a strong super-magnet, running it along the grip to feel if it 'pulls' all the way along. I also note that a small circular hole thru the tang along the neutral axis does not significantly weaken the blade. The neutral axis is a line where the blade & tang under load is under compressive loading above, and tensile loading below. On the line, there is essentially zero loading. It runs along the centre line on a normal rectangular section. Last edited by kronckew; 9th February 2019 at 06:31 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 476
|
![]()
Hi kai,
Before resorting to an x-ray as kronckew suggested, you might want to check for continuity first. Attach a wire lead to the blade and to one of the poles of a D cell. Attach another lead to the other D cell pole and to the suspected tang. Then touch the blade and the suspected tang with a circuit tester. If the circuit tester doesn't light, there is no continuity and you don't have to go any further. If there is continuity, then the piece on the pommel is either the tang or it is a metal pin that is in contact with the tang so an x-ray would then be necessary to determine which is which. Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
I have had the opportunity on several occasions to remove the style of hilt shown in the original photos to make repairs. On every one of these the tang extended completely through the hilt before being peened. I have yet to see a single hilt of this exact style that had a hidden tang combined with a butt plate held in place with a separate fastener. There was one occasion though where I found that the tang had rusted completely through and the hilt was being held in place by a combination of rust buildup on the tang and shrinkage of the hilt material.
![]() ![]() Best, Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,165
|
![]()
Agree with Robert. I have only seen full tang hilts that were peined over the plate.
Ian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Thanks all - I apologize for not responding earlier!
I agree that this is quite unlikely to be anything else but a full tang. Unless the tang is fully corroded, this will be easy to check with Rob's suggestion; simple electric testers are now very cheap and will come in handy for similar tests, including the pins at the side. Also strong magnets as suggested by Wayne come in handy for a variety of purposes. I'll report back when I find a bit of time for a testing session! Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 476
|
![]()
Hi Kai,
I knew it after I posted so I double checked myself online. My circuit instructions are incorrect (it has been a long while since I built a homemade continuity tester). The battery has to be connected to the two continuity tester probe wires, not the blade and the suspected tang. As you suggested, testers with built in batteries are relatively cheap and it would probably be best to just buy one. If you want to go the homemade way, I found four u-tube videos showing how. Sincerely, RobT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|