10th May 2008, 07:39 PM | #1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
Massive Sudanese Spear Head
I picked this up last week it was a bit over cleaned but it is still an excellent example. I put an average size Sudan spear next to it for comparison.
Lew |
10th May 2008, 08:05 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,807
|
Interesting. I have that extra inch for a deeper more satisfactory penetration, also a very long halft too long to show and I do not like to boast about it.
|
10th May 2008, 08:38 PM | #3 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
Quote:
Once you get past the first 10-12 inches the rest isn't going to matter much. Lew |
|
10th May 2008, 08:42 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,807
|
How true Lew, indeed less can be seen as more.
|
11th May 2008, 02:33 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
I ain't saying nuthin'
|
11th May 2008, 11:17 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sint-Amandsberg (near Ghent, Belgium)
Posts: 830
|
Very nice, guys.
I think this spearhead is Sudanese, too. The blade itself is more slender, with a very pronounced middlerib (hope this is the right word). But its dimensions ! ! ! Total length of the spearhead : 57 cm (about 22,8 inches) length of actual spearblade : 39 cm (about 15,6 inches) In my humble opinion, a slender blade will have more penetration power than a broad blade. Perhaps these broader blades were also used for 'slashing'. |
11th May 2008, 03:00 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,857
|
The broad blade is not intended as much to penetrate as it is to cause a wide, likely irrepairable blood losing wound, not to mention that the width makes it's likely it will hit some vital organ.
No doubt intimidation was a factor in the production of these as well. |
|
|