![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,895
|
![]()
Evgeny, this truly is a beauty! and while I cannot place the deeply stamped mark as yet, I am inclined toward an Eastern European origin for the sword. I have seen the pommel type but need to check further. Hopefully more advanced members will offer insights, but I will surely keep looking myself.
Any notes you might add as far as possible provenance or findings thus far in your research? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 206
|
![]()
Jim, thank you for reply. As I know this sword/saber was found somewhere nearby the former Moldova principality. Unfortunately I do not have more details.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,895
|
![]() Quote:
The best bet is going to be guys like Jasper, who know from hands on experience, these kinds of markings not usually in these references. I look forward to hearing from him and anyone else who might have seen this mark, but continue looking and hope to learn more on this sabre type. Thank you very much for posting this and the information. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 206
|
![]()
Thank you, Jim! I hope that together we can find out what this marking is.
I forgot to mention that there is an inlaid inscription on the blade that looks like: "E ... + X". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,895
|
![]()
You bet Evgeny! Actually I have been working on this all day, and dragged out every resource I have on hand.
While I could not find an exact match, I not reluctant to express my thoughts based on the information I could find. I enjoy researching from examples such as yours as it is a learning experience. If the 'experts' come in and correct my observations, then all the better ![]() It would appear from info in Wagner (1967) that your saber (hiebmesser) is likely of German, E.European origin and likely 16th century by the form and character as seen in the images. This was of course a transitional period and diffusion of blades and styles moved in all directions regionally, especially with mercenary forces and colonization. The curved blade with yelman such as yours is known in Bohemia in 16th c. but these type weapons were well known for burghers earlier. Hungary and Balkans were populated by Germans, so the German form would not be surprising with Moldava provenance as you note. The pommel reminds me of the schiavona types though not the exact same and these are known to have come from Hungarian swords of these periods into Dalmatian regions. With the marking, I went through everything, Lenciewicz, Gyngell, Kinman, Gardner, Wagner, etc. and no EXACT match. However I found comparisons similar in styling with joined geometric designs, in a sigil like fashion, and the split foot (tails) is apparently used in Milan situated marks. Otherwise the design resembles early Passau type markings of 1520s-60s. It is tempting to consider this sword may be of S. German origin to East Europe of 16th century, with character of earlier straight blade swords (Oakeshott type III) in the hilt with a curved blade favored in E. Europe. The use of blade inscriptions is fascinating and it would be good to make this one out. I wonder if your mark may have been latten filled. The marking may be a sundry example which may have incorporated any of the elements of others circulating in these times, and possibly by armorers outfitting mercenary forces in Passau for one. These and other regional locations had blades, swords and other arms from makers in Solingen and Styrian sources which remain unrecorded as far as markings in many cases. Sorry unable to find a match, but I think the rest of the detail is somewhat plausible as far as the sword overall. Authentication is of course best determined with hands on examination and analysis. Looks like a great piece !!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 688
|
![]()
Yes interesting sword. The National Museum of Hungary has a large number of swords with similar pommels. I understand that these swords were mostly ordered and imported to Hungarian lands (much larger area in those days) from N.Italy and S.Germany and Austria. Sometimes the swords are called Schiavonesca (suggesting Slavic use) although these tend to have S shaped quillons. As Jim mentions there were lots of mercenaries active in the region in those days.
I note that the mark is in relief with sunk background which must be unusual except for Spanish sword marks? I normally see this mostly on halberds. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Evgeny, can you show as the whole sword, clean as it is now ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,895
|
![]() Quote:
As you mention, that sunken cartouche punzone style does recall the Spanish method, and it seems those influences well diffused into provincial regions of that empire. With weaponry of these times, it does seem that these kinds of stamps would be placed on the various forms provided by suppliers in centers frequented by mercenary forces so marks on polearms perhaps might have been applied to swords brought into these centers. It would seem that expanding the search for comparisons to this mark into the broader scope of arms, including guns, may give us more options. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 688
|
![]()
Although I could not find an identical mark in Staffan Kinman’s excellent European Makers of Edged Weapons, Their Marks (2015) I found examples of the sunken cartouche punzone marks as Jim calls it. There are other similar marks in the book from Munich and Passau.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 206
|
![]()
Jim, Victrix, thank you for the great analysis!
Last edited by Evgeny_K; 1st December 2019 at 07:45 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 206
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chino, CA.
Posts: 217
|
![]()
These marks seem to be serif and somewhat random or unpredictable in their form. I wonder if this was meant to act in a similar fashion the cattle brand marks which were designed to ward against being modified. In the case of cattle branding it was an anti theft thing. In the case of blade making perhaps it's an anti counterfeit thing? Or perhaps they are compound alchemical symbols to denote alloy?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 688
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
, |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 688
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
Whether brought by the Visigods or the Vikings, a current conviction, is hard to say; we have had countless races passing or staying over here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 206
|
![]() Quote:
Here it is. Whole length is 107 cm. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Great work ... and great sword; thank you for sharing, Evgeny
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,895
|
![]() Quote:
As someone who has been nearly obsessively interested in markings on swords for more years than I can estimate, I wanted to say I like your thinking on this. In mentioning 'cattle brand marks' ....some years ago I was involved in studying markings found on Sudanese 'kaskara' of the 19thc. + The idea of their perhaps being linked to cattle brands (various tribes were cattle herders) came to mind, and I found resources on this practice in some degree. While unable to find any direct connection documented, the similarities were compelling in many cases. Even more fascinating were notes that some 'cattle brands' could be plausibly related to certain Egyptian heiroglyphics, which are of course of great antiquity. As Victrix has noted, symbols have often become the markings used by tribes or persons as visual identifiers since ancient times. I recall fascinating works by Iaroslav Lebedynsky on the 'tamgas' of the tribes of the Steppes, as well as the brilliant work by Helmut Nickel, describing these. These markings, sometimes derived from devices used on standards carried by tribes as identifiers in battle (precursors of flags and guidons) eventually became developed into the charges and devices used in heraldry, in these cases particularly Polish and other East European. The purposes of these markings on many examples of weaponry through many contexts is of course speculative, and even more subjective are the possibilities of sources they might be drawn from. However investigations in comparing instances and examples can often present pretty compelling and amazing plausibility. In accord with examples shown in Wagner (1967) and others, it seems this wonderful sword is most likely East European by its character. It would be fantastic to find a corroborating match to this deeply stamped marking, and as always, .....the search goes on! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 206
|
![]()
In addition to the marking already shown, there are some symbols on the blade inlaid with copper (?).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|