![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]()
Hi All,
Forgive me, I disturb you again and again, with pictures. What I can share with you is only in pictures. Only pictures, and just only collection. Thank you.. The second snake-like curves spear, supposed to be Pengging style luk. Pengging is a period before the beginning of Mataram period... The style of swimming snake? Ganjawulung |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Nice, I've seen Pengging examples from Hidayat's collection, (in pictures only)
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 928
|
![]() Quote:
Why disturb? Is a pleasure for eyes and mind! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Java
Posts: 137
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Just want to join, here I posted another keris with luk which called "Rengkol" as Gonjowulungs spears. And I think the keris with luk still can be used for weapon. In my mind, the keris with luk more suitable for weapon because it can make wider rip on body/skin when it used to stuck. That because from first luk at the point to bottom side made more wider. When we stuck the keris to the body, every luk will make wider rip on the skin. Different with straight keris which has simple form. But stright keris more focus to the target and make a dirrect stab. In the other hand, the keris with luk look stronger/rubbery because it has luk which seems like a spring when we used to stuck. I think it shown that the mPu on past period had thought about weapon structures, strength, and capabilities, etc... ![]() Thats just my opinion ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
Technically, with its slender profile, I doubt it makes an effective weapon. In a one-on-one encounter, an opponent could possibly deflect an attack quite effectively, with capability to disarm the keris wielder, with a piece of cloth/clothing. When facing multiple opponents, this type of blade tends to get stuck when stabbed. Retraction might be slower, worse if it get stuck in between the victim's ribs. If targeted at the lower abdomen area, it might not penetrate the opponent's 'ikat pinggang' or the blade might 'buckle' due to its 'fragile' looking nature. It might be more for aesthetics reasons rather than practicality, imho. ![]() My question: Where lies the strength of these Pengging-specific luk blades? ![]() Last edited by Alam Shah; 1st June 2007 at 12:37 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2
|
![]() Quote:
Yes correct!! that you were disturbing me again and again, as you have some Rare & Nice Pengging Tumbaks, but you just show them to me. You never allow me to offer some "mahar" on even only one of them. He..he..he. Sometime it becomes an addictive being "disturbed" by such this. Thank you Ganja, Alengka's Prince |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
What I learned from Javanese tangguh, is mainly "style that differ from other period". So it was a matter of identity. That is the most important. From the style of weapon, and of course the specific style of sheath, one can differ where did the pusaka's holder from... (IMO, and no "direct source") To learn tangguh, is not a study of just reading. But also seeing, looking, watching carefully thousands of blades with different styles. After "jam terbang" (Oops, flying hours? Help my English, please...) advanced, then you may be able to know -- or at least to predict -- from with style. Pengging, very special in luks. Thin like Majapahit style, but good iron, good "garap" (working), although only for short period... (I will add more, soon) Ganjawulung |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
My earlier comment is just my personal observation and opinion. My opinion still stands, unless it could be persuaded otherwise. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]()
Dear Shahrial (part 2),
I like to have a keris from "short period" tangguh, like from Kesultanan Pajang (1551-1582) and of course from Pengging period (after Kesultanan Demak 1480-1550) and before 1582 Mataram Period. Usually, the short period has a very specific type. Like Pajang, has a special type in the base of two sogokan. (I can't say it with word. One must see the blade). Pengging, has a "luk rengkol" with good iron, and slim model. The first spear in the picture above, is very strong. (With a "gigir sapi" or say it, back bone in the middle of the blade), strong enough to stab somebody. The Pengging style (picture 2), is also strong although it looks slim (but not to thin, with good iron). Are those spears only for ceremonial purpose? I don't know. But in my opinion, the slim blade is quite strong to stab somebody... You will try? Ganjawulung |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
Knowledge on keris is not only reading or making the new keris and sell it to other person with certain good price, but also seeing as many kerises possible. Keris is like the book itself. We can not learn tangguh (style, based on the period the making of the keris) from just reading books. You must see the details with your own eyes... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
Ganjawulung |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I do welcome more info on 'Pengging' period pieces. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]()
Dear Shahrial and All,
These pictures below, showing spear point of tangguh Pajajaran (The Hindhu Kingdom, the ancestor of Islamic Kingdom of Cirebon). It wears dhapur (people called it) "kuntul ngantuk" (sleepy bird, a kind of paddy field bird with long beak). Tangguh Pajajaran, usually has a good iron, good pamor (Pajajaran Kingdom has good relation -- if I'm not mistaken -- with Portuguese). But not Pajajaran awal (in the beginning of Pajajaran), which usually not quite good iron. Nearly budo iron in kudi and kujang... I don't know whether you see a "raja gundala" in this Pajajaran spear or not.. It was formerly owned by a dukun (practitioner) in Central Java. And the dhukun had died, his son sold the spear to me... Ganjawulung |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]()
Dear Shahrial and All,
Want more? This is a very humble piece, a spear which (supposed) bears tangguh Mataram (Islam, not old Mataram Hindhu) period between 1582-1749. The dhapur is "korowelang", a kind name of lokal snake... Ganjawulung |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
I am very very interested in the "kelengan" (black only) keris. The garap is so nice. From which tangguh, mas? Ganjawulung |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]()
Dear Shahrial and All,
This piece, is from tangguh Cirebon, almost the same period of Demak. (Demak 1480-1550). Dhapur trisula. Many pusakas in Cirebon, are tombaks and kudi or kujang of Hindhu Pajajaran. This is one of the popular model of Cirebonese trisula (three points spear). They have also, dwisula (two points spear). Hope no too much. Sorry for disturbing you... Ganjawulung |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,819
|
![]()
These are quite unusual and attractive forms, Ganja.
Could you oblige with a 90 degree close up of the metuk of each of your Pengging tombak, and a 90 degree close up of a section of the blade? I would appreciate it if the metuk could be photographed without the landhean, so that the first section of the pesi can be seen. I apologise for lodging this request with you, and hope it does not cause you too much trouble. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
Hope these following pictures will answer your request. The first spear, I suppose not from tangguh Pengging, but the luks are pengging-like style. Unfortunate, the first one was waxed in the landeyan, so I could not open it. But the Pengging spear, I am showing you with pleasure in these pictures. Ganjawulung |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Java
Posts: 137
|
![]() Quote:
Actually me my self not too sure about the tangguh of my keris ![]() So, would you please give me an advice. Did it the Pengging keris too ? Here I send more pictures. Thanks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 199
|
![]()
pengging or pakubuanan???
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]()
Dear Mr Hidayat and All,
Tangguh is not a certainty. The word itself shows, that the meaning of "nangguh" (in keris term) is "guessing the period of making, based on specific details of the keris or spear"). If I say: "My keris or spear bears tangguh Pajajaran or Pengging, or Majapahit", once must be understood to as "supposed to be made in Pajajaran period" or possibly, "supposed to have Pajajaran style,". Many kerises, supposed with certain tangguh, actually was made in the different period after. From time to time, "knowledge" on tangguh is an oral and visual knowledge. One learns (or knows) tangguh, from seeing blades or spears. Sometimes from written opinion in the past, but really difficult to imagine the reality, without seeing examples. What I've known about tangguh, also seeing from thousands of kerises from hundreds of keris owners. Either they were keris collectors, or royal family (kerabat keraton), or at least from people which has collection of old heirlooms. You may find such source in Surakarta (Solo) or Yogyakarta. "Nangguh duwung" (guessing the period of making the keris), is always debatable. In my experience, other people can be other opinion on tangguh. But at least, there are certain compromises in specific details, like specific luks, the shape of ganja, the shape of kembang kacang, the sogokan (pajang style, if I'm not mistaken, has a specific form of 'bawang sebungkul' -- form of sogokan base in the keris, not form of pamor --), and tangguh pengging with very specific luks usually (not certain) not more than five luks. Some Mataram style, has rengkol luks too. (See pictures below, spears supposed to be from tangguh Mataram Senopaten, or Senopaten style at least). One decides tangguh, also from the iron of the blade. Tangguh Sedayu (actually, Sedayu is the noble name of empu Supamandrangi in Majapahit period or he wore name Empu Pitrang in Blambangan. Sedayu, very wellknown of its specific 'black' iron which is only known by seeing it. Like Pengging, was not a period of a kingdom. Pengging was only a Kadipaten in the period of Demak Islamic Kingdom. Pengging under Ki Ageng Pengging (formerly Ki Kebo Kenanga), disobeyed the King of Demak as a result of 'different aliran of Islam' with Demak -- see 'stories' on Syech Siti Djenar -- and Pajang period, is a very short Kingdom after Demak, but just before Mataram (Sutowijoyo, or Panembahan Senopati). From which tangguh? Let's guessing your keris, afterwards... Ganjawulung |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Java
Posts: 137
|
![]() Quote:
Raden Usman had gave his opinion (thanks), and perhaps it can be a Pengging or Pakubuwanan keris. But I'm not sure, because the ricikans form of my keris not shown the Pengging keris. I think the Greneng and Jenggot too sharp and the ada-ada also sharp too for Pengging ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
The luk's style, is pengging style. Very wavy. But if you see the details, you will find the 'strong' characteristics of "not tangguh pengging". Details of "rong dha nunut" (often erroneously spelled as "rondo nunut") or double greneng in the keris' tail, plus the complete ricikan/details in the gandhik -- see, there are "janggut" and "jenggot" on the "sekar kacang", clearly believed to be "Empu Kasa Style" or at least Madurese style. "Rong dha Nunut" or double greneng, means "two dha above the greneng". Dha, is the 12th character of Caraka Script (ha, na, cha, ra, ka, da, ta, sa, wa, la, pa, dha, ja, ya, nya... etc). The form of one greneng, is "dha" in Caraka script. And "nunut" is "to go with someone, for instant if someone invite you to go with his car together...) Please don't spell it as "rondo nunut" or "I go together with a widow", or "The widow is living with me...". About this, of course Mas Mans Hidayat already knows well. Many Mataram style kerises bear the complete ricikan like "Kasa's style" or Madurese style. Look also my "Kalabendu" luk 29 in the other thread. There are also double greneng, or "rong dha nunut". It supposed, that the empu of the Kalabendu keris, was Madurese origin. About your keris, is quite embarassing. Because, the "garap" or work of art, is very fine. With kruwingan on both side of the blade, from "sor-soran" (keris base) to the point of the keris. Like many Mataram kerises. The iron, also embarassingly good. Overall, the "garap" quality of this keris is excellent. But, I guessed, that this is a "nom-noman" or "nem-neman" keris. Kerises which were made in the Mataram era (1582-1789) and after -- until now, usually called as "keris nem-neman". Please, correct me if I'm mistaken, Mr Hidayat... Ganjawulung |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 199
|
![]()
dear Gonjo,
the borderline between nem-neman and sepuh may be vary. to people who favor majapahit will consider keris made afterwards as nem-neman. to people who favor mataram will consider mataram kerises as tangguh sepuh. to me, if and only if, the date of keris made is younger than my birthday will be considered as nem-neman. it relates to my dream. instead of as part of history, I want to watch keris as a part of art which is still being developped by society. Whenever keris becomes a part of history, so does javanese. anyway, in discussion, I will follow the borderline (nem-neman v. sepuh)accepted by most discussants, "ngeluk practice". |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
Ganjawulung |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,819
|
![]()
Thanks very much for those pics, Ganja.
Sorry it took me a few days to get back to this thread. I was involved in sporting competition over the weekend. Pengging is a problematical tangguh. I've seen a number of keris that have been identified as Pengging by people whose opinion I must respect, but never two keris the same. The concensus of opinion seems to indicate that what I show below are the dominant characteristics of tangguh Pengging, but getting two knowledgeable people to agree that a particular keris is Pengging seems to be asking for a lot. Characteristics of a keris of tangguh Pengging: Tanting:- light Besi:- fine grained and dense Pamor:- a rough distinct grain that sometimes runs across the blade rather than parrallel with the edges Baja:- middle quality, correctly forged and heat-treated. Pawakan:- the cross section is like rotan; some keris have kruwingan; the wanda (sorry, I cannot give an adequate English word) is a haunted feeling. Gonjo:-sirah cecak very finely pointed, but sometimes rounded, gulu meled is very long, cross section of gonjo is rounded Gandhik:- large, well proportioned, but rather short. Blumbangan:- boto rubuh (fallen brick), deep and wide Sogokan:- wide, deep, round bottomed and sides undercut Ada-ada:- small and not to a sharp ridge Kruwingan:- deep and continuing to the point (where kruwingan exists) Luk:- very deep , steep curves; these curves are very different to those found in all other keris. Wadidang:- a long deep curve that starts suddenly. The three most respected ahli keris whom I have known during my life were all in agreement that these are the characteristics of a Pengging keris, however, getting universal agreement from them that a specific blade was Pengging was an entirely different matter. Probably the major problem that tangguh presents is that in recent years collectors and dealers have wanted to apply it to classes of keris that it was never intended for, and the result is that now we have a very great deal of confusion. Personally, I am extremely reluctant to be at all definite in respect of tangguh from any photographs. Even the very best, top quality studio photographs in hardcopy can be misleading, to try to play the tangguh game from internet photos is something that is simply beyond my ability. Yeah, something like an old, degraded Segaluh, I'm prepared to give a qualified opinion on, but most other classifications, I would want the bare blade in my hand before I'd be prepared to venture an opinion.You cannot feel the weight and balance from a photo, and you cannot feel the material. You cannot look at the weld joint where the pamor meets the steel core, and see what sort of welding has been done. Plus 100 other things you cannot do from a photo. As Ganjawulung has already pointed out, you need to handle thousands of blades under respected guidance before you can get a feel for tangguh, you cannot learn it from books. I don't believe it is possible to give positive tangguh opinions from photos, either.And tombak are 100 times more difficult than keris. I have heard the joking comment in Jawa that tangguh was invented to give men something to talk about. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: J a k a r t a
Posts: 991
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|