Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 9th January 2009, 09:34 PM   #1
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,290
Default Dredging This Up Exotic Flintlock

Any ideas from the gun lobby ??
http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/002066.html
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2009, 04:36 AM   #2
M ELEY
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,089
Default

Hi Rick,
Not an expert gun lobbyist , but having read the old comments on this piece, I truly feel that it is NOT a copy. I have a VERY similar piece in styling (but not the markings or length, of course)that was percussion and came from an old collection, ca. 1850. I would agree with the forumites who suggested India just based on some clues. #1 The designs do distinctly look more Indian than Islamic. Most of the Persian types had more elaborate and distinctly decorative butt caps than your model. #2. The length! Very impressive and reminds me of at least two other examples I've seen in auction catalogs listed as Indian sub-continent. Sorry, I no longer have the exact references. Because of the relatively late usage of earlier-style firearms in this region of the world, despite it being flint lock, I suspect it to be more mid-19th century judging from the wear/patina, but this is just my two-cents. On to the real experts...
M ELEY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2009, 04:46 AM   #3
Anandalal N.
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 84
Default Dear Rick,

I would ask you to consider a couple of aspects. Firstly, the basic elements of the pistol seems to be well fashioned. The wood, the brass trigger guard and butt tang, and the lock seem to belong together. The ornamentation on the barrel and the lock are at stark contrast therewith. So consider the possibility that the ornamentation of the barrel and lock could have been introduced subsequently. Overall the gun to me seems of European manufacture and design whilst the ornamentation on the barrel and the lock could be Indian. Could you post a photograph of the tang button of the butt tang. Pl. note that I have not included the barrel in the list of original components. I am uncertain about the barrel and feel that there is a posibility that it was introduced too. The damamge in the wood would be consistent with that. The barrel is rounded thorughout and the barrel tang also is not consistent with European design in my opinion. If you are looking at the ornamentation elements I would look at the barrel and lock seperately and the elements on the wood, and the brass seperately. The lock itself which is one of the critical elements in a firearm seems to be of European manufacture. As for age I would go for the 19th century.
Anandalal N. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2009, 06:29 AM   #4
ward
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
Default

Have seen Balkan guns like this with similar chiseled human figures on the barrel. Can you post closeups? Costumes they are wearing should tell more about origin but it looks from your pics like Balkans, also overall form is Ottoman Empire not Indian. Definitely right though, not a copy.
I didn't see anything like this when I was in Tunisia last year but arms migrated quite a bit along with the men that used them and a lot of mercenaries from Bosnia and Albania served in N. Africa. Again I'd like to see better pics but looks 18th or early 19th c to me. Nice old soldier
ward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2009, 07:10 AM   #5
kahnjar1
Member
 
kahnjar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,739
Default

Very rust(ic)
Seriously though, I agree it does not look Indian to me either. More Balkan area. Could be European---Belgian?? made for the eastern market. Any marks under the barrel?
Regards Stuart
kahnjar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2009, 03:11 PM   #6
Pukka Bundook
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
Default

I'd go with Balkan or Turkish/Moorish.

If it was European, the style would dictate it was made early to mid 18th Century, but in Turkey and such, this style was made well into the 19th century.
There is nothing wrong with the round barrel and square tang that would say it Isn't European, and the straighted frizzen was quite often used on European arms, yet the overall look and certainly the heavy decoration says Balkan or Turkish to me.
I think the decoration could have been added later, as it's not up to par with the overall looks of the piece.
A good example of ; "now, if it could only talk!"

R.
Pukka Bundook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2009, 06:06 PM   #7
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,290
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by ward
Have seen Balkan guns like this with similar chiseled human figures on the barrel. Can you post closeups? Costumes they are wearing should tell more about origin but it looks from your pics like Balkans, also overall form is Ottoman Empire not Indian. Definitely right though, not a copy.
I didn't see anything like this when I was in Tunisia last year but arms migrated quite a bit along with the men that used them and a lot of mercenaries from Bosnia and Albania served in N. Africa. Again I'd like to see better pics but looks 18th or early 19th c to me. Nice old soldier
Closeups Ward .
Thanks !
Attached Images
        

Last edited by Rick; 10th January 2009 at 06:18 PM.
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2009, 08:12 PM   #8
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,290
Smile One Last Image

Faces are everywhere; all the spaces between the figures have animals and monsters carved in .
Attached Images
 
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2009, 02:03 AM   #9
ward
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
Default

The bearded face on the breech and the frizzen are what I was looking for,
definitely Balkans. They carved that same face on dagger handles and other things, looks almost like a Viking motif. Who knows, it could be. They were around there at one time.
The clothing the figures are wearing isnt Indian either, could probably identify it by browsing some ethnic dress websites. Early 19th century is probably about right.
ward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2009, 02:56 AM   #10
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,290
Smile

Thanks Ward, Richard et al .
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2009, 04:09 AM   #11
Anandalal N.
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 84
Default

Just one question. Does the bearded face close to the breech end have a 'third eye' and the one on the frizzen too or is it some other symbolism?
Anandalal N. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2009, 05:05 AM   #12
ward
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
Default

I think its pretty clear the one on the breech is wearing a helmet.
One on the frizzen, its harder to tell. But a third eye?
Dont see it sorry

Last edited by ward; 11th January 2009 at 06:10 AM.
ward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2009, 06:25 AM   #13
Anandalal N.
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 84
Default

Hi.

Helmet. Hmmmm. OK. I thought that was hair above with a lock falling on the forehead. I could be wrong. Just expressing my opinion.
Anandalal N. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2009, 09:44 PM   #14
ward
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
Default

The figure on the upper cock jaw and the big one on the barrel look to be wearing helmets too, with a lot of feathers? At first glance they look Indian but I've seen a couple of these pistols and a long guns It was a rasak and had the same Euro type flintlock and barrel with those figures.
ward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2009, 10:26 PM   #15
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,290
Smile Rasak

Hi Ward, Rasak as in ?
http://www.nmm.ac.uk/collections/exp...cfm?ID=AAA2546
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2009, 11:10 PM   #16
ward
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
Default

Yes. They are supposed to be from Albania but probably came more from the general area. i've seen some with Greek names on them too.
ward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2009, 02:46 PM   #17
Pukka Bundook
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
Default

The sword worn by one of the figures appears to have the ottoman/Persian shamshir grip as well.

The face on the top of the barrel at the breech resembles the old German Bellarmine jugs from 16th century....but I'll still go with Turkish/ottoman /Balkan. these were all at one time part of the same empire anyway, so it isn't like I can't make up my mind!!

Richard.
Pukka Bundook is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.