Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 9th February 2023, 06:36 PM   #1
SwordLover79
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: San Diego
Posts: 56
Default short Italian Rapier?

Hello; I recently purchased this short sword. 31 1/4" blade and 38 inches overall. The pommel, quillons and ring guard are decorated with Roman or Greek faces in silver (I think). The blade is marked on both sides "XX FRIDERICO PICININO XX" and an arrowhead and line through a circle. So...is this a short rapier? a riding sword? Italian? Approximate date of manufacture? Any insights are appreciated...
Attached Images
    
SwordLover79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2023, 09:09 AM   #2
Merenti
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 67
Default

you're right about Italy. it's a pillow sword around 1600. A beautiful piece that I would also like to have in my collection!
Merenti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2023, 09:57 AM   #3
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,058
Default

it is not a rapier, a rapier has a minimum length of 112cm to be a rapier.
It is a beautiful silver encrusted transitional sword from between 1645-1655, maybe Dutch.
A shortened rapier blade is used for this smallsword. Many transitional (small-)swords have a shortened rapier blade. FREDERICO PICININO was often written in the fuller as a quality indication, it does not mean that Picinino manufactured this blade.
If so...... there should be his oval mark of "a tower" and the text around "Picinino" at the ricasso , ps Nice to see the encrusting over the ricasso.
May have been slightly longer initially, but need not be, a length of around 1 m was quite common.

very nice quality sword

best
Jasper
Attached Images
 

Last edited by cornelistromp; 10th February 2023 at 03:56 PM.
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2023, 03:59 PM   #4
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cornelistromp View Post
it is not a rapier, a rapier has a minimum length of 112cm to be a rapier....

best
Jasper
Where did you get your definition of a "rapier's" minimum length?
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2023, 09:20 AM   #5
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,058
Default

JP puype mentioned it to me during a discussion about rapiers but I believe it is in one of his publications, his reference was some 16/17th century fencing book that mentions this minimum size.

best,
Jasper

Last edited by cornelistromp; 11th February 2023 at 10:10 AM.
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2023, 11:12 AM   #6
kronckew
Member
 
kronckew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cornelistromp View Post
JP puype mentioned it to me during a discussion about rapiers but I believe it is in one of his publications, his reference was some 16/17th century fencing book that mentions this minimum size.

best,
Jasper
That seems a bit arbitrary and inflexible, and hardly a universal Standard set in stone & immortalized by an irridium bar kept in a vacuum at 20c.


Even Wiki (and google) mentions an 'average' length of 104cm.
kronckew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2023, 03:56 PM   #7
cornelistromp
Member
 
cornelistromp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,058
Default

It is splitting hairs and I'm happy with any length but what google and wikipedia say about it is about the length that we now measure of what we consider a rapier today.

I'll ask Jp puype the reference when I meet him again.
what I shortly could find about rapier lengths is:
Sir John Smithe refers in "Instructions, observations and orders mylitarie" 1595 - the rapier blade has a length of 1yard and a quarter and more. (bl+114cm)
George Silver Paradoxes of defence, London 1599 does not specifically state rapier length but does state sword blade length for men of tall statures of, a yard and three or foure inches, and no more. (+- 1 meter max).
In his opinion Rapiers were longer and could not be used in battle.
Together with the grip and pommel this comes to about 112cm allover length max. for swords and rapier to be longer.

best,
Jasper
cornelistromp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2023, 08:51 PM   #8
SwordLover79
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: San Diego
Posts: 56
Default still gathering feedback...

Guys - is there any chance this might be a child's sword given it's length?
SwordLover79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2023, 09:47 PM   #9
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

How about a rapier length to be according to its owner stature. I hear that the ideal length is that in the quillons (crossbar) come up to your belly button, when the point is resting on the floor; between 99 cms. and 114 cms. total length. Just because a little fellow looks to have a sword proportional to his best handling, such would not demoted from the rapier typology.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2023, 04:58 AM   #10
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando View Post
How about a rapier length to be according to its owner stature. I hear that the ideal length is that in the quillons (crossbar) come up to your belly button, when the point is resting on the floor; between 99 cms. and 114 cms. total length. Just because a little fellow looks to have a sword proportional to his best handling, such would not demoted from the rapier typology.
Thats a very good point Fernando. Swords of this character were typically commissioned to a cutler who would fashion it in accord with specifications.
As far as I have understood the only specifications setting standard for sword blade length were those prohibiting excessive length rapier blades.
The notion of a minimum standard may have been a convention in cases as noted by Mr. Puype.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.