7th December 2008, 01:42 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Tanto: What do we have here?
This is owned by a friend of mine who obtained it in a lot of three Japanese swords. He brought it to me to examine and handle earlier this week.
The blade has been seriously abused by someone with a belt grinder, but it is quite "beefy" and heavy, so there is plenty of metal left to polish. The horimoto (carving on the blade) is detailed and deep. All the fittings are either horn or iron inlaid with gold. Even the seppa are horn covered in gold. It is complete, with the exception of a missing kozuka (scabbard knife). We removed the handle and examined the tang, which was devoid of any maker's marks or mei. However, it was covered in thick, dark stabalized patina. (He didn't forward photos of the tang to me yet, but I'll post them when he does). |
7th December 2008, 05:32 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Sure, it your friend's
Just fess up, Andrew, you are switching from SEA to Nihonto! |
7th December 2008, 01:58 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
Can't tell a whole lot about the blade due to lack of pics of it. I suspect
Late Shinshinto. The horimono (blade carving) is poorly done, so I suspect a later addition perhaps to cover a flaw in the blade (commonly done). The koshirae are most likely post war pieced together (nothing matches) done for sale to the West. Keep in mind this is all speculation based on pictures and I could be very wrong. Still could be an interesting coffee table tanto - nothing wrong with that, I have a couple of them :-) However, I would strongly recommend it be seen in person by someone knowledgeable in Nihonto before you or friend think of having it professionally polished. The polish could cost more than the tanto is worth. Rich S |
7th December 2008, 03:19 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Quote:
|
|
7th December 2008, 03:24 PM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Quote:
Is it common (or significant) for the tang to be devoid of marks? |
|
7th December 2008, 03:55 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
Yes, quite common for blades (of all eras) to be unsigned. About half of my
collection is composed of mumei (unsigned) blades. It may (?) by possible if the blade was in better condition to make a guess as to the school or even the smith. But again that requires someone much more knowledgeable than I; in hand inspection and the blade in good polish. There were a variety of reasons why blades were unsigned. For some smiths it was considered improper to sign them; for others they didn't sign because they felt it wasn't their better work; many blades have been shortened over the years and the signatures cut off. Rich S |
7th December 2008, 09:08 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 182
|
I agree that the quality of the horimono is quite low. Maybe you could show a few more pics of the blade and the tang.
Peter |
8th December 2008, 08:36 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
More pics:
|
8th December 2008, 09:41 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
More...
|
10th December 2008, 12:54 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,225
|
Eek
Always hurts to see what people can do to a blade. |
|
|