Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22nd December 2004, 11:11 PM   #1
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default Kris for opinion

What can you tell me about this one?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...e=STRK:MEWA:IT
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2004, 12:16 AM   #2
BluErf
Member
 
BluErf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
Default

Ooh... a rare form of Riau Bugis keris handle or East Sumatran... I think Dave has a couple of examples of ite more common cousin. Look at the subtle but beautiful refinements on the neck and on the head of the handle.

But, without the sheath, its quite hard to pin down it down for sure. The blade is probably East Sumatran. Not quite the typical Riau keris blade.
BluErf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2004, 03:38 AM   #3
DAHenkel
Member
 
DAHenkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
Default

Interesting find Ariel. I've run into one or two of these before, most recently in Melaka - sadly so battered yet overpriced it wasn't worth considering - but they don't turn up often. They're clearly an uncommon variant of the "kerdas" hilt form and likely from the somewhat amorphous family of Straits Bugis keris. Its a shame its missing its scabbard as this might have helped in identifying it. Very likely the sheath was the more or less typical 'square' Bugis style sheath however to the accustomed eye there is a huge amount of variation in this form and this can sometimes help in attribution.

The blade is also a bit hard to place precisely and may be a trade blade. No doubt Eastern Sumatra is a safe bet though I've seen South Sumatran blades very much like this one.

The hilt in my collection which BluErf is refering to is somewhat different from yours, though both are probably related. Note in the image below the clearly defined medial ridge joining the tanjak and garuda mungkur on mine, while on yours the top of the head and the garuda have become a more or less amorphous blob. you'll also note that the body of mine, while perhaps a bit "stockier" than the usual Straits Bugis keris, still more or less fits the mould, while yours is a fairly unusual shape. Very flat across the back of the head, with a rounded face and rather thin at the neck and waist.

The keris in my collection has the so-called chieftain form sheath and a typical Straits Bugis blade. The keris I encountered in Melaka recently had the same sheath and blade form but again, the hilt was more like yours. This again suggests that the two are related although you can never be 100% sure.

Once more, nice find!
Attached Images
  
DAHenkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2004, 02:48 PM   #4
ronpakis
Member
 
ronpakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: netherlands
Posts: 75
Default

to my opinion a south sumatran blade, rather nice quality, palembang? its rather unusual to see high quality blades elswhere on sumatra esspecialy with pamor.
but the selut and grip are more towards eastern sumatra, i really like the handle, old and not very common try to find a very nice scabbard for this one. my compliments.
ronpakis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2004, 06:49 PM   #5
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

Many thanks for the opinions but the congratulations are misplaced: I did not win it. I did not even bid on it: krises are not my cup of tea.
However, just on general grounds I was quite impressed by it: it seemed to be of better quality than a lot of stuff sold on e-bay. Glad to have a confirmation of my gut feeling from real specialists.
Happy New Year to all of you!
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2004, 03:02 PM   #6
DAHenkel
Member
 
DAHenkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
Default

Keep in mind though Ronpakis that the entire Straits of Melaka is a hodge podge of different styles and different bits and pieces. These people were anything but sedentary and travelled up and down the Straits extensively.

Certainly there are definite styles in South, East and North Sumatra but never be surprised to find a S. Sumatran blade dressed in Riau style or a Riau blade dressed in Deli style or any other possible combination on and on ad infinitum. East Sumatra and much of the West coast of the Malay Peninsula is particularly bad. I like to use a general category of the Straits keris. This can be further broken down into Straits Bugis, Straits Malay and Straits Minang based on the general characteristics. But one thing is certain, there are no hard and fast rules - and if there is a hard and fast rule, it is to be prepared to be surprised.
DAHenkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.