![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 736
|
![]()
This is my last adquisition and I´m very happy with that. Is a katipunan sword, the handle are two carved snakes , one eat the other snake. The guard seems silver and in the blade is wrote Republica de filipinas , a symbol of the katipunan and San Miguel de Mayumo. Total lenght 29,5 inc.
The end of the blade is more damaged. Thanks Carlos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
|
![]() ![]() Thank you for sharing. Dan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,324
|
![]()
Hi Carlos,
How old do you think it is, and was it for real use ? ( I myself am very suspiscious when such text is carved in the blade). I am not familiar with these sort of weaponry, but thanks for sharing. Oh...Came the pelt lying beneath with it? Than it probably was a philipino bullock or cow! ![]() Regards, Maurice |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 736
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Maurice!! I think is a real sword, the sword has a beatiful patina and marks of battle. I have looking for in internet about the words engraved and the symbol is a symbol of katipunan. The pelt was from my pet, he bite one of my swords!! ![]() ![]() ![]() Regards carlos |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 264
|
![]()
WOW! Very nice!!!
San Miguel de Mayumo is the old name for San Miguel, Bulacan Province. Biak na Bato is also located within San Miguel...Biak na Bato was the old headquarters for Aguinaldos revolutionary government(pre-1st Republic). I initially thought this sword maybe from the "revolution" because of the San Miguel de Mayumo inscribed on the blade. But looking at the symbol(sun face and triangle) and "La Republica Filipinas", it indicates it is from the "Philippines 1st Republic"...in other words from the Philippine American War era. Malolos, Bulacan was the location of the 1st Republic. My guess would be this sword belonged to a General(Jefe) or officer of the San Miguel district. After lurking and searching through older threads, I notice most refer to any sword of this era(Philippine American War) as "Katipunan" Swords. To be politically correct, all swords/bolos/daggers designed and made after the Tejeros Convention are no longer Katipunan. In history, the Katipunan was only active during the "Revolution". The real Katipunan organization ended after the Tejeros Convention took place(March 1897)...the Katipunan group was dissolved completely, changed names, and evolved in to Aguinaldos revolutionary government...and when Aguinaldo returned after the battle of Manila and set up another government in Malolos, the organization again evolved and became the "Republica Filipinas"(Republic of the Philippines). Andres Bonifacio was the father of the Katipunan, most hardcore enthusiasts believe, when Andres Bonifacio died, the Katipunan died along with him(Aguinaldo had him killed). The Sun Face is a Katipunan symbol but when it is placed "within" the Triangle it is more associated with Aguinaldos government, being he specifically asked for this symbol on the 1st Philippine Flag in 1898...the sun face triangle didn't exist during the Katipunan era. I know most veteranos of Aguinaldos government still considered themselves "Katipunans", this is because they took the blood oath for an old organization they still believed in, and they fought in both the revolution and Phil-Am War... so they can be defined as both, the Katipunan first and the first soldiers of the 1st republic. Many soldiers/generals/officers also did not take part in the Revolution and did not take the blood oath...they are not Katipunan members and do not refer to themselves as such. Many historians are quick to correct people on these two differences. Me personally, I dont care which is used for swords, but I thought I would just throw this info out there. ![]() Last edited by Dimasalang; 1st February 2009 at 08:59 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 736
|
![]()
Thank you very much for the information, is a pleasure read this type of post with all this information.
Thanks again carlos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 293
|
![]()
It is a beautiful sword. I hope it finds its way back to the Philippines someday.
Dimasalang, your contribution is much appreciated! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 40
|
![]()
This thread is interesting! Just found a sword with different profile but the same theme up to the script of the blade!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Wow, another great find - congrats!
The pommel seems to have more going on - could you please post more close-ups of the hilt? Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,069
|
![]()
Very nice pieces here, thank you for sharing!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 40
|
![]() Quote:
Sorry been buisy. One thing this is a beefy blade. The hilt is beefy aswell, I think it 2 snakes biting each other. Eyes are green inlay. Another interesting feature is that ricasso covered in silver. Reminds me of a Japanese habaki. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 736
|
![]()
Great find!!!! I saw auction but seller didn t send to Spain , and the auction was closed before time ...
Thanks for posting Carlos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]() Quote:
Please show this hilt from all angles including a top view! Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|