![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 68
|
![]()
Total length is 29 cm, blade length 13.5 cm.
Comments are welcome. It is also possible that someone will translate the signature on the tang. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Is it still an aikuchi if it has an integral guard like this one? Is the grip loose when pegged? That tang redrilling/hole overlap looks like it'd be loose. Hopefully the habaki takes up the slack. Is the blade new, or has someone cleaned the tang?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
![]()
This appears yo be a ken. But I cannot distinguish clearly the hamon so I wonder if it really is nihonto. The signature also looks strange, at least on one side.
The oxidation of the tang looks like fairly recent production. My guess would be Showa wartime. I am not familiar with this type of koshirae but it definitely is not aikuchi. And most likely it is not Japanese. ![]() PS: Maybe you should address this to a forum specialised in nihonto, like Nihonto Message Board. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
![]()
Agreed, post it to Nihonto Message Board. Nice looking, possibly recent (Showa) ken blade. Previously mounted - two mekugi-ana,
One through part of mei. What is the koshirae made of? Never seen mounts like that. Rich |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 88
|
![]()
This is a KEN, it is dated 1874, and it appears to be signed Hozan but with the extra hole and the odd orientation I am a bit challenged. The mounts are terrific
Peter |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,069
|
![]()
Nice to see a Japanese blade here. I look forward to seeing more about this one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,430
|
![]()
A most interesting and unusual dagger. Japanese double-edged blades being less common than single-edged. Looking forward to hearing more about it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|