17th October 2015, 07:45 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
A HELMET FROM A FUNERARY ACHIEVEMENT
When a knight or member of the nobility died, particularly if they had a reputation as a warrior, a special helmet called a funerary helm was hung near or above their monument. Such funerary helms could be purely ornamental, but were more commonly actual armour worn by the person during their life - though not necessarily a helm used in battle
Even with alterations this helmet is still an interesting historical piece ,It has two-piece skull with prominent comb with turned edge And also various patched repairs .The comb fitted with a funerary spike to the top. The skull is probably first half of the 17TH Century. Any comment on it will be welcome. Cerjak |
17th October 2015, 07:46 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
other example
|
17th October 2015, 08:22 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 400
|
Congratulations Jean Luc,
this is clearly an antique funural helmet made of old parts and as you said, it is part of history. Kind regards Ulfberth |
17th October 2015, 09:06 PM | #4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Very interesting acquisiton, Jean-Luc.
Felicitations |
18th October 2015, 12:26 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
PICTURES FROM CHURCHS
Other funerary HELM
|
18th October 2015, 05:17 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 214
|
Funnery achievements were earlier on components of the actual armour of the deceased. These later examples are interesting in their own right for a sometimes different reason in that they are often made from odds and ends of original functional components and quickly ginned up elements. Jean's example seems to be made from elements of 17th century cuirassiers helmets. The bowl was damaged, the front made from two non matching components ( this visor clearly was intended originally for a helmet with a much more pronounced chin ) appears to be from a different helmet than the bowl as the flange carrying the gorget plate on the front sits considerably lower than the flange ( which has been cut away ) on the bowl of the helmet would have been ( as the back gorget plate goes under the front gorget plate when the helmet is closed and one this obviously would not be possible the these elements ). This is a nice classic example of a later funnery achievement of the 17th century made up from original components from several other helmets.
|
25th October 2015, 09:17 AM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
Quote:
Many thanks for your imput .It is always good to have your opinion. Best Jean-Luc |
|
3rd November 2015, 08:33 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 252
|
I have one similar to Cerjaks but put together in a more naive way. It was described by Bonham's as a reproduction of a funery helmet in a seventeenth century style . Which seemed a little odd since it also incorporates bits of a genuine helmet and there is nothing about it that suggests it isn't seventeenth century. On a recent visit to Cotehele in Cornwall, I found a virtually identical helmet which was described as an undertakers funery helmet which seemed to me to make sense. By the beginning of the seventeenth century the funery achievement had moved down market and the implication is that undertakers provided or perhaps hired out rather crudely made helmets as part of the funery trappings , but not necessarily for permanent display in a church.
Image 1 is the Cotehele helmet and 2 and 3 our version. Last edited by Raf; 4th November 2015 at 03:38 PM. |
19th February 2019, 08:23 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
|
What was the purpose of the central spike?
|
20th February 2019, 04:05 AM | #10 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,938
|
Quote:
Very good question! The subject of medieval helmets used in funerary situations has brought up many questions concerning the curious fixtures and additions to armor and particularly helmets. As these types of armor and helmets were later used to adorn the tombs of figures of rank and title in the tradition of early use of actual armor......they were made often with features to accommodate their display. In the case of the spike, I believe these were to mount the family coat of arms (or charges as seen in post #5). Naturally not all displays were the same, so many helmets are without it. |
|
20th February 2019, 06:45 PM | #12 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,938
|
Quote:
Good call!! I should have said heraldic crest instead of coat of arms!!! It sounds gooder. Last edited by Jim McDougall; 20th February 2019 at 10:08 PM. |
|
21st February 2019, 06:05 PM | #13 | ||
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
As you started your reply to CSinTX with an aquiescing : Quote:
|
||
21st February 2019, 06:47 PM | #14 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,938
|
I didn't notice that you haven't cracked the riddle in your last paragraph.[/QUOTE]
These funerary armor elements really do pose riddles, as they become entangled with, or are presumed to be, actual pieces of medieval armor. I recall one case where there were odd attachments on the back of one which were theorized to be for preventing the helm from becoming detached or some such. Turned out to be mounting attachments for display. |
|
|