![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Hallo, does anybody knows what this canons could be? 65cm Long, around 30-35 kg each, caliber around 3,5 cm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Welcome to the forum, df
![]() Let us see what the members think of your cannons. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 124
|
![]()
Their small size suggests that they may have been intended as swivel guns.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Possible, thanks for your estimation…
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Wondering if the VIII stands for the size and HF is the manufacturer or iron foundry….
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 403
|
![]()
This is probably another statement of the bl**ding obvious, but they have a naval\maritime look about them.
Regards Richard PS. and not very well cast. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
This was also my thought, even when I got them from a castle nearby in south Germany….
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,168
|
![]()
The join between the barrel and the trunnions looks a lot like a corroded arc welding bead, I'd think a mould pattern would have a smoother transition. I don't think Heinrich VIII had any arc-welders.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 124
|
![]()
I have been involved, directly and indirectly, in a number of restorations some of which have included new trunnions and the guns that are subject of this post do not appear to have welded on trunnions.
Below are photos: Showing a gun with its original trunnions - virtually everything about which appears identical to the subject guns. Showing a gun having new trunnions welded on - evidence of such a weld & its 'clean up' are virtually impossible to disguise against close inspection. Showing a completed gun that has new trunnions & chase. At a distance the trunnions appear okay while the new chase is easily detected due to its lack of surface corrosion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Thanks! Do you have any clue where such canons where in use? Even in this small versions…ships or fortifications? I guess this signs HF is the manufacturer but no idea who this could be….
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Manufacturer?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 124
|
![]()
I think you will find that the two main uses for guns of such small nature was either as swivel guns, whether on a boat, ship or fort's rampart or as largely decorative arms in stately manors, castles and similar buildings owned by the aristocracy & wealthy.
I agree that those marks are probably those of the foundry. You might consider it worthwhile to engage the experts to tell you what they can at https://www.basiliscoe.com/ Last edited by adrian; 15th January 2022 at 12:33 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Aren't these too heavy/massive for swivels ... and no aiming tail
![]() No offense but, have you tried elementary tests like introducing a stick into the barrel and check it it goes through all the way down to the touch hole ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Yes they are open till the touch whole as it should be…no offens at all!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
|
![]()
Better pictures of each touch hole? How do they compare? If they were shot very much, the touch holes wear down.
Also pics of the muzzles? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 124
|
![]()
Aren't these too heavy/massive for swivels ... and no aiming tail
At only 65cm long & about 35mm bore these are of correct size for swivel guns & although some swivel guns had an integral 'tail', or 'tiller' many did not and the tiller was either a separate item attached to the cascabel or incorporated into the swivel 'yoke' mounting. Although it won't make a lot of difference it would be helpful to confirm if the measurement provided is overall (face of muzzle to rear of cascabel) or as was officially done (face of muzzle to base ring) ? I am assuming it is overall. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
It’s correct overall length. The light spot in the gun barrel is from a torch on the touch whole….
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Are the bores cylindrical, without constrictions or irregularities from casting? For guns that are meant to be shot, this is important. Besides the bores going all way back to the touchhole.
The reason I ask is that a little bird in back of my skull is suggesting that these might be barrels from small saluting cannons. Make to fire blank charges, of course. If they came from a castle in south Germany, it's not an unreasonable suggestion because the landed gentry / upper crust who lived in these places did like to shoot off festive salvos on special occasions. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,198
|
![]()
As far as I can see this canons are made of cast steel and not of bronce. As this material was not in use in central Europe at the time when this type of canons was in, both should have been made in Scandinavia, perhaps in Sweden.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 124
|
![]()
With the description 'cast steel' do you actually mean 'cast iron' ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,198
|
![]()
i mean cast steel, but perhaps I am wrong. A friend of mine, owner of a very famous artillery-museum and a real specialist told me that this canons are probably made of cast steel The production methods of making cast steel had been invented in the 1740s in England but came into use in central Europe not before the 1840s.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 124
|
![]()
The common use of cast iron versus the rare use of cast steel in this period aside the two metals display markedly different corrosion characteristics and these guns have every appearance of being made of cast iron. I would be astounded if they were anything else.
Cast steel was a technology that was neither very practical nor affordable until after the introduction of the Bessemer process in the mid 1850s. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 403
|
![]()
I think it is quite possible that these are signal cannon. They would not be solely for saluting or ceremony but more or less in everyday use when some kind of warning, synchronisation or attention seeking was necessary. Thus cannons were fired by light house keepers as fog warnings in certain situations. Guns were fired at noon or a specified time so that time-keeping or certain activities could be co-ordinated. British admirals and naval bases were known to fire a cannon when they were about to hoist a signal by flag.
Today, the breaking of the ramadan fast is often announced by a signal cannon. The more one thinks about it the more one can imagine their use in a time before electronic communication and when not everyone had a watch. Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
I believe they are swivel guns, either from a ship or maybe also from a castle. See: https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drehbasse
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
This one is from demensions, weight and marks identical….
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 403
|
![]()
So now we have three of them?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,168
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Yes they are identical, but Iam as stated before quite sure the number 8 (VIII) is telling the size of the swivel canons from the manufacturer HF.Just the producer sign HF I really have no idea. Anyhow many speculations, but interesting to know that the same model is rigth now for sale in the USA…
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Swivel gun for sale on a auction in Germany in 2008
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Germany
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Water discovery ….
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|