1st May 2017, 01:09 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
A heavy French siege helmet Excavated in Bourgogne.
A heavy French siege helmet Excavated in Bourgogne.
Two pieces skull faceted in fourteen sections with a pivoted peak This helmet is with additional plates mounted on the skull . Siege helmet with such faceted skull are very rare. Weight about 7 kg. Any comment on it would be welcome. Last edited by Cerjak; 1st May 2017 at 05:23 PM. |
2nd May 2017, 09:42 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,058
|
weight of 7kg is not possible for a helmet , do you maybe mean 1.7kg ?
best, Jasper |
2nd May 2017, 10:02 AM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
Quote:
Jasper, There is no mistake in the weight ,some siege helmet are about 10 kg ( see this example http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/26527 Date:ca. 1600–1650 Culture:French Medium:Steel Dimensions:H. 11 7/8 in. (30.16 cm); W. 9 7/8 in. (25.08 cm); D. 11 1/2 in. (29.2 cm); Wt. 20 lb. 9 oz (9.34 kg) Classification:Helmets Credit Line:Gift of William H. Riggs, 1913 Accession Number:14.25.495 a second siege helmet from my collection http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...t=siege+helmet Best Jean-Luc |
|
2nd May 2017, 06:52 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
the bullet Proof
That dent is the bullet impact Proving that the helmet would absorb fire from hand gun, the dent it made in the skull, showing that the bullet didn't penetrate.
|
2nd May 2017, 07:50 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,058
|
I see, very heavy to wear though.
best, Jasper |
2nd May 2017, 08:00 PM | #6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Owners necks would have to be stronger than those of Formula 1 pilots, due to G force .
|
3rd May 2017, 10:14 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,182
|
a lot of the weight would be distributed down to the rest of the armour and padding the helmet rested on and thus the shoulders took a lot of the burden. i think they and the rest of the armour were heavier as manning the walls didn't require the same mobility as on a battle field, and the extra thickness helped against missiles. if the enemy ever got over the walls and fighting became hand to hand, a lighter armour might be better. you could switch if you knew when they were going to make it over.
|
|
|