![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
![]()
Not sure where to post this. I was wondering if there is any direct relationship between Finnish puukko and ancient seax? Any thoughts or comments welcome. Stylistically there is no similarity that I can find.
Rich |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]() Quote:
Also in question is what you exactly mean when you say "seax". I believe the word literally just means "knife", from a root word that means "to cut" and blades that have been called seax come in a great variety of shapes and sizes. There are short seax, long seax, broad seax, curved seax, "broken-back" seax. They really all seem like completely different knives and swords that all fall under the single name. Most of them, however, do not seem to be nearly as small as the puukko, which is generally more the size of a parring knife. The Sami knife, which seems much more related to the puukko than the seax does, would be closer to the size of many medium sized seax, but i still don't see any developmental relationship there. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
![]()
Thanks David -
I was thinking more of the "broken back" seax style. I've done what research online that I can but can find no direct link between the standard puukko style and the broken back seax. I should have been more specific in my original post. Rich |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
![]()
I do not think you will find any relationship other than roughly the same geographic area. As was pointed out there is a size disparity and if memory serves me the edge geometry is very different. The handle shape and attachment method I believe are different as well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 336
|
![]()
I'm not sure if there's Finnish or Sámi examples in the archaeological record, but I've seen a few examples of Viking era, or just post viking era Scandinavian small knives of fairly similar design. In fact the modern Morakniv is quite similar to a puukko.
I suspect there's a nearly straight line between Viking era knives and the modern puukko (and also the modern Morakniv). Have fun, Leif |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
While not really familiar with the 'puuko' knives, I know there was a great article written by the late Robert Dohrenwend :
"The Puuko", Arms Collecting, Vol. 39, #1, Feb. 2001 It seems another reference is "Collectible Knives of Finland" Lester C. Ristenen I believe Alan Maisey is a notable collector and authority on these as well. From what I have understood, the puuko appears to have been designed and popularized by the Saami people of Finland over 1000 yrs ago. While modern examples do not seem to have the 'broken back' blade character typically, I am not familiar with older ones. The broken back seax does seem to have been well known in Germany from c. 8th into 11th century Germany, which would well correspond with the generally recognized 'Viking Age' from 8th c. into 11th (1066AD). It seems likely these seax may have influenced the development of the puuko, but the articles mentioned and experts might share more detail. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|