|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
21st June 2022, 06:30 PM | #1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 913
|
A Trio of Chinese Swords Joins the Accidental Collection
I do not ever hold high expectations of interesting swords showing up at a nearby general and estate sale auction that I frequent. Though one of a group of four Chinese swords in a recent sale appeared interesting from the teaser photo, my low expectations almost meant I did not attend the preview, but then I went along with a friend who wanted to buy something else that he did not bid on after seeing problems with it that were not evident from the pictures.
The first of these swords was a very nicely made and mounted jian with a stainless steel blade, clearly recent. That left three dao all, upon closer examination, with laminated steel blades. I pursued the two longer examples successfully and left the shorter ring pommel to a competing underbidder who never claimed his purchases and so I ultimately bought the ring pommel when it was re-auctioned. All of these three swords appear to me to have older blades that have been refurbished by polishing of the blades and rewrapping of the hilts. I turned to Peter Dekker’s excellent essay to refresh myself on what these were. My favorite from the start, the longest, at bottom in the group images, appears to be a yànmáodāo (goose quill saber) by curvature or a yútóudāo (fish head saber) by profile with a concave back false edge from the rise on the back. The middle one also has a brisk turn-up in the distal curvature of the blade, but there is a very gentle curvature proximal to that so I suspect this would best be called a liuyèdāo (willow leaf saber) rather than being another goose quill example. This blade seems to have been in the worst condition of the group prior to its repolishing. I’ll appreciate any further insights members may wish to provide. |
22nd June 2022, 05:07 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Lee,
I am intrigued by the chape of the second from the top sword: it is very different from what I am accustomed to see on European and Indo-Persian scabbards. Are there examples of a similar appearance elsewhere except for China? Was it an established Chinese pattern? In other words, where was it invented and was it adopted by other cultures? Thanks, Ariel |
22nd June 2022, 06:57 PM | #3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 913
|
I can provide a more detailed image, which I have done below, but unfortunately I am ignorant of the origins of the design. A few other dao in my collection have somewhat fancier and shorter metal encasements of the scabbard tip while this one is longer and less wide.
Hopefully Philip, who wrote one of the articles I consulted, or another member may be able to give an informed answer. |
2nd July 2022, 12:42 PM | #4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 913
|
Garbage?
So, no interest in or comment on these swords? Are they all very, very recent 'fakes' - I am not afraid that I was 'taken' as I do not have a lot invested in them. So, please, enlighten me!
|
2nd July 2022, 03:24 PM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
Quote:
I know, it is a frustrating experience to show a sword for discussion and get zero responses. In your case it is not so much lack of interest in a particular posting as the lack of knowledge about the general topic (thin line berween the two but you understand my meaning) I can hardly remember anyone on this forum dedicated to Chinese swords. Your query can be professionally answered only by a Chinese-focused person, and I can recall only one,- Peter Dekker. Certainly there are others in the general arms-collecting community, but I just do not know of them. Sorry for being of no use. |
|
2nd July 2022, 04:53 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,806
|
Lack of knowledge indeed. I had a huge good steel, two handed Chinese sword with a long rectangular red painted handle. A brass circular loose fitting guard. Your usual militaria people would say this is just a show theatre sword. I now deeply regret letting it go for very little. If you have a hunch don't be fooled by lore and the uniformed. Hang on to it until sure.
|
2nd July 2022, 07:53 PM | #7 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
How about PhilipTom; i guess he didn't notice this thread... yet !
|
2nd July 2022, 11:05 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
|
|
4th July 2022, 07:52 PM | #9 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 913
|
Quote:
I have attached an image of the pommel showing the peening of the tang in the sword with later cupronickel mountings as you have suggested. I refer to my collection of about a dozen Chinese swords as my "accidental" collection as for whatever reason, knowledge about them was pretty scarce in my earlier collecting days and so I never actively sought them. I guess a number of other collectors were influenced by the same information void. Fortunately a few really nice examples did find me over the years (via Scott Rodell, the Yaroms and Peter Dekker) but a number were chance encounters. I remember a dealer in Brimfield once 'begging" me to take a pair of Chinese swords, a big ring pommel and a big ox-tail at $75 each, if I recall correctly. I suspected they were recent and artificially aged, but I took them home anyway as he had done me well on another item. Months later, I examined them with more care and realized they were decent antiques! |
|
4th July 2022, 11:12 PM | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
Thanks for the photo. The appearance of the peened iron doesn't have the color and texture of something that's been accumulating patina over as many years as that blade is likely to have been around. The brass of the pommel appears to be of fairly flimsy sheet. This spells "late" and possibly decorative or theatrical to me. A blade like the one on that's on there now would likely have had something more substantial. The more I look at the suspension system, the stranger things become. Not only are the soldered/brazed-on bands highly atypical for a saber scabbard, but also I see that the tops of the loops are also attached to the bar itself in a similar fashion. In almost all cases the bar itself is a one-piece construction, either forged and drilled/filed in the case of iron, or cast to shape in the case of non-ferrous alloys. |
|
2nd July 2022, 10:52 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
Lee, what a great scoop. Amazing how this stuff gets around. I know the ring pommeled one well, it was owned by a collector in Hawaii in the 1970s. It was in ratty shape when he got it, the wood grip almost rotted away and lots of pitting on the blade. I did the polish that you see now. Also made the storage scabbard, it's not historical in style, just a functional thing to protect a sharp and freshly polished edge. Had to re-manufacture the entire wood grip, and put the braided cloth wrapping patterned after an original. The owner didn't want the fabric "antiqued" since he was concerned about it later being passed off as old. Am so glad it's in your hands now!
|
2nd July 2022, 11:25 PM | #12 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
The iron fittings, heavily corroded, appear en suite and most likely original to the saber, which was probably carried by a lower-echelon field officer. A lot of these old rusty iron fittings were once decorated with silver koftgari, but the corrosion pretty much killed it off (iron and silver are an unstable combo anyway, the reason that Indian and "Islamic" weapons are more often seen with better-preserved gold than silver koftgari on hilts). The profile and style of the scabbard is correct. This is a nice example of a Qing military saber, I would estimate its date to be mid-18th to the turn of the 19th. You see the same pattern depicted in Qianlong-era military portraits and battle scenes, the most accurately-rendered ones based on sketches by Jesuit missionaries who sometimes accompanied the campaigns as documentarians. It is also illustrated in Fr Joseph Amiot's (very rare) book on all things China, his chapter on military affairs even quotes from Qing production manuals regarding the materials and manufacture of army equipment. The regulation styles changed in the 19th cent., favoring brass for most types, with bulbous pommels, oval-section sheath and grip, and rounded scabbard chapes. |
|
|
|