![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Not my area of knowledge or collection, but just out of interest.
This one just finished on e-bay. I would like to hear your opinions. The blade looks to me reworked european. The top of the scabbard has nice decorations. The gangya is separate and the line is almost straight. These are the features that drew my attention. Was I right? Should I have fought for it? Was it a sleeper for the New Year? The files are too big. If anybody can resize them and put them here for posterity, I shall be grateful. ( If they are even worth showing here:-)) http://www.ebay.com/itm/ANTIQUE-EARL...p2047675.l2557 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
Here you go
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]()
It's been scrubbed with sandpaper which is a shame.
The blade looks to me like it's a reused blade and the configuration of holes make me think it was once mounted as a large pata or possibly Firangi or similarly mounted blade with bars/mountings that are riveted to the blade. Last edited by Atlantia; 25th December 2012 at 12:34 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
First, thanks for your help with pics.
Very clever idea re. origin of holes. But, if so, it must be rather old, isn't it? To switch from the european blade to pata ( 19th cen at the latest), and then to move to Mindanao. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
Lots of trade though in the region with India.......
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
You are welcome. I also have an interest in these 'anomalies' so it's always nice to see items like this one. Last edited by Atlantia; 25th December 2012 at 09:24 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,731
|
![]()
Very intersting piece, thank you for posting. Haven't seen it!
![]() Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Sorry, I meant to add the I don't see any reason why the blade couldn't be very old. The surfaces have been reworked to make it into this incarnation and then it's been recently harshly cleaned hiding any signs of age by taking it all down to bare steel. In one pic I can almost 'see' the outline of the reinforcing bracket over the blade, what do you think? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
In my dilettante opinion, the entire wide part of the blade below the gangja was formed from a separate piece and the original blade was inserted and forged there.
If that was the case, I see no reason to see the holes in the original blade. No? Also, I do not see the bracket; rather, it is a fuller, and it stops suddenly ~ 1/5 of the way from the gangya. That's one of the reasons I suggest the existence of a separate thick piece where the blade was inserted. Last edited by ariel; 25th December 2012 at 02:38 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]()
I like it.. But maybe not a trade blade? The holes could have fillers (silver/gold etc) I just cant see how the wide area is created without seeing any forge lines or the blade becoming slimmer there due to flattening that area.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
ariel, i don't think it was an indian blade. i think at one point that particular kris has that fancy plate at the widest part of the blade, belonging in the category of this particular piece: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=15535
kino's example on post#7 appears to have rivets (albeit his has 4 of them going down. yours might have just two ). the profile of the blade appears to be similar to mine in which it has a slight overall curve, and if you notice, a single groove on the lower edge. the handle on that is oriented the wrong way, btw... adding kino's example as well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
I am with Lotfi .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
And Spunger:-)
Sorry, the answers started to pour in. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Ah! Excellent catch Spunjer, That explains the 'outline' that I can see. Bravo Last edited by Atlantia; 25th December 2012 at 03:49 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
So, gentlemen, with all the pics, do you have an opinion on the age and value ( NOT MONETARY!) of this kris? Any thoughts on the origin of the blade? Rarity?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,731
|
![]()
With some restore work, the plates need to added as well the baca baca and the handle seem not original anymore. When this would be done it will be a very nice kris and also rare IMHO.
I think the blade is from Sulu. Age I would guess second half of the 19th century but there are members who will know it better. Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
With all the changes, what would be left of it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,287
|
![]()
I think you were wise to avoid battle over this kris, Ariel .
Fully restored (probably a lot of dollars later) you would have yourself something not quite authentic in others' eyes, I think . I would also estimate the age of this piece a bit earlier than late 19th . ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,731
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]() Quote:
![]() That said i do believe that Spunger's post shows a good guess of what probably occupied the holes in this blade. I'm fairly sure this was always a kris. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,731
|
![]() Quote:
Jose have given back many kris their baca-baca/asang-asang, many kris I have seen here at this place has get partly restore jobs at the handles, recently for example: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=16562 or a new wrapping. Nobody from us know how they have looked originally. The kris/kalis in question has a well preserved scabbard but the kris byself is a relict, the handle isn't original or not in it's original state anymore, the asang-asang is missing, the plates which was attached are missing as well and the blade was heavily scrubbed with sandpaper. There will be every time different opinions what should be done but I agree again with you when there will be done a great restore to this kris it should be documented and by a possible reselling told. By my kris (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=16260) I am not really happy with the result but I think there was no other possibility to keep the scabbard. Here is a thread from a restore Jose have done once, a kris which was a more bad relict as the one from Ariel, worth in monetary value as well in historic value nearly nothing: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...ighlight=kalis Should it have been done or not? I personally think sometimes it's easy to decide and sometimes difficult. Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,100
|
![]()
Frankly Detlef, i think you did a great job with your restoration. First of all, we all know that sheaths will often be changed in the lifetime of a blade. So if one can restore the old sheath like you did or even create a brand new one from scratch as Jose did in the link you provide i see no real problem with that. It is just respectful to the blade to provide it with a good home.
My concern arises when we consider making physical changes to the blade such as with Ariel's example. Adding a new plate onto the blade requires a great deal of guess work and pretty much changes the blade forever. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,731
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Possible new plates could be plain and would be attached by rivets, easily removable when wished. By one picture Ariel provide I think you still can see how long they have been and which form they have had. But like I have written before, there never will be an unanimous point of view and it will be a norrow path to do such a restore or not. Some will decide to do it, others not. But I think we have agreement by the handle and the clamp. Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,730
|
![]()
Detlef, i can, up to a point, see adding a baka-baka. but the problem with the plate is, we don't have a clue of its significance. is it merely for decoration, or does it have anything to do with something else? by adding a plain plate, what would be the significance of it? i was told at one time that having talismanic symbols is not by choice of the warrior. i thought about this and it make sense. as superstitious as these warriors were, you would think all blades will have some type of magical symbols. the plate might have some type of magical significance for all we know.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,731
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
Since my name has been mentioned several times, I would like to way in a little.
It is always a difficult issue to restore a piece or not. Some recreation is involved, although what I do is based on research on the tribal art patterns, other tribal pieces, the time period of development, etc. I guess a bigger question is how much restoration? I figure that radical restoration that either involves replacing half the original work could be called reconstruction, or if it means swapping/cobbling pieces together then it could be called a monstrosity. I would not apply this to newly made pieces. This particular piece in question seems to be on the borderline, especially since this involves the soul of the piece - the blade. It would require more than just replacing lost inlay. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|