![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]()
Hello colleagues by collectors, I recently bought a dagger in one of the old collector and want to know your opinion.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
|
![]()
In my opinion, I think it's a modern build with imitation ageing applied.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]()
Hi Messia,
The state of corrosion seems natural to me. Otherwise it is the very best artificial aging I ever saw. I don't believe in artificial aging, because it would be pretty unusual for european blades. It also make no sense, to age the blade but not the hilt. I tend to believe it is a 19th century work. If you can find traces of laminating, the blade could be from 15th century. But this is almost impossible to judge from the pictures only. I added two pictures of genuine ear daggers. They are a clear evidence, that one cannot judge the age of a blade from its state of corrosion! Roland |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,192
|
![]()
I found the mark on the blade in " Wendelin Boeheim, Handbuch der Waffenkunde". But it might be difficult to decide wether it is an original mark or a fake............
corrado26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 132
|
![]() Quote:
Solothurn Philadelphia |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 385
|
![]()
Hello Messia,
Dear All, I have taken some detailed pictures of the pitting of this dagger and added a sword pommel , that has in my view has the same kind of pitting. Does anyone have a different view or do we see similar pitting in all pics. Just added a blade with different more profound pitting. Thanks in advance for your comments Ulfberth Last edited by ulfberth; 19th June 2016 at 10:24 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 132
|
![]()
A similar mark is also reported to be on a 17th century rapier and the breastplate of a Maximilian armour, both from the former collection of Karl Gimbel. A strange assortment...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,711
|
![]()
Here is one I have in my picture archive. I think that the one in question is an original antique piece and very nice!
![]() Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
The really old ones were orders of magnitude more elaborate and artistic.
The one in question IMHO is most likely early-mid 20 century. Except for some pitting it has no signs of age. Might have been kept un-oiled: corrosion sets fast. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,711
|
![]() Quote:
Hello Ariel, I am by far not an expert by this daggers but the attached ivory at the ears look very old to my eyes and not like 20 century ivory. And look at the piece in up from post #5 Roland has posted, this piece isn't as well not very elaborate and artistic but since it seems to be a museum piece clearly antique. ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
OK, let's date it to the 19th century:-)
Even then such dagger would be a replica. The real ones were out of commission by the 16th century, but replicas were made all the time. https://myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=22689 I am with Roland. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
![]()
When did acid-etching such as on this dagger start being used to decorate weapons like this?
Common in the 19th century for sure. I have 19th century blades with similar corrosion, so I think 19th century replica fits the appearance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,869
|
![]()
I have a hard time telling but if that motif is indeed acid etched, it would certainly seem to place into 19th c.
The cross in the shield while of course simplistic, seems to be an arsenal type mark of Vienna, which would account for its occurrence on polearms. If it was some sort of guild associated mark, that would explain why it might be on a dagger blade. Daggers were of course personal, not issue type weapons, thus the arsenal suggestion for halberds. According to Mann (Wallace Coll. pp.374-75) these 'ear' daggers are of early Spanish-Moresque design which reflect even earlier Eastern forms which include the 'Luristan' types and of course yataghan hilts. These were produced in Italy, mostly Venice, in the 16th century+ and termed 'daga alla Levantina' or 'alla Stradiotta', often by 'Moorish' workers in Venice. Typical arms interaction between Vienna and Venice would account for the diffusion of course to the north. I would be inclined to regard this example as possibly 17th c. though would consider the etched design possibly later as noted, but not sure of the antiquity of this process, As far as pitting and corrosive activity, it seems to me that this kind of light pitting is not unusual for very old weapons, and is commensurate with the static situation of the weapon and such circumstances. If it was on display or static for some time, dust and moisture absorption would be evident on the side most exposed. Still, again depending on situations, any type of corrosion can accede rather quickly in cases. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,192
|
![]()
I found this ear dagger in my foto archive with the equivalent description of the seller:
Magnificent 19th C. Spanish Ear Dagger in 15th C. Moorish style, Toledo work of Zuloaga type: A truly magnificent antique ear dagger. This example has a fine grip and is covered in silver and gold koftgari of very fine quality. A very beautiful dagger and almost impossible to find at all in any condition much less this quality. Dates to the 19th C. and likely composed by the finest toledo smiths in the classical spanish Moorish style typical of the finest Eusebio Zuloaga work. Overall length is 16", 10" blade, 2 3/4" from ear to ear. corrado26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]()
add photos from another phone
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]()
and
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
How relative may the antique attribution be ?
Calling an end XIX century ear dagger an antique is eventually a figure of speech. Whether not well established if Nasrids brought this dagger from North Africa to the Iberian Peninsula as being a weapon of their creation or if indeed it has a previous (Oriental) provenance, the fact is that it is one of the more important contributions of the Nasrid panoply, like the jineta, was well available in their workshops in the XIII century; in such way that the only original example of this type, eventually belonging in the attire of Muhammad XII (Boabdil) when he was captured in the battle of Lucena (1483) is already considered by specialists as a 'later' version; in any case, an example matching with the adornments of a king, now in the Real Armeria de Madrid, the shield of the Nasrid sultanate figuring in its scabbard. But a adornment was also the one we can see depicted in a portrait of King Emperor Carlos V (circa 1519). So calling XIX-XX century examples a replica wouldn't be such a crime ![]() . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,869
|
![]()
Further, as well noted by Fernando:
From "Arms and Armour of Spain: A Short Survey" Ada Bruhn de Hoffmeyer, p.200 "...the Spanish dagger above all, is however the ear dagger". "...the eared dagger is of oriental origin. Very probably it has its origin in Iran or at the borders of the Caspian Sea. Its earliest forerunners are to be found in Luristan among eared daggers of the Bronze Age. Later time Iranian specimens with grips of ornamented silver from about 400-600AD have almost the same shape as the Spanish types. They may also be called the prototypes of the ear dagger. It came to Europe with the Moors of Andalusia and partly with the Saracen artisans working in Venice. " Clearly this classic form is found in antiquity, and was replicated in commemoration of these traditional daggers at various times over the centuries. It seems well established that the 19th century replicas of these forms have indeed become antiques in their own right. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Another interesting reference is a 1964 article by J.J. Rodriguez Lorente, which suggests criteria for distinguishing ear daggers of Moorish, Spanish, and Venetian craftsmanship.
The XVth Century Ear Dagger. Its Hispano-Moresque origin The article mentions a large collection of daggers held by the Museo Lazaro Galdiano. Nine daggers appear in the museum's online catalogue: Museo Lazaro Galdiano A little drawing by Hans Schaufelein (c. 1510) shows that Northerners were also aware of this style of dagger, and made use of it at least as an "exotic" artistic element. Hans Schaufelein, Archer Drawing His Bow |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Check out this one... auctioned by Czerny's in March 2010, estimated at €18,000, went for €210,000. Then in October of the same year, resold at Sotheby's for more than €4,200,000!
![]() Czerny's, March 2010 Sotheby's, October 2010 On the hilt, between the ears, the dagger bears what appears to be the Nasrid coat of arms. The same arms (and same maker's mark of an orb-and-cross) appear on other daggers, such as one in the Bargello. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,869
|
![]() Quote:
Roger that Nando!!!!! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,869
|
![]()
Interesting to see the discussion and responses posted here on this dagger, in comparison to its posting now running concurrently on sfi forum
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
You ain't seen nothing yet. How is your castillian ?
![]() http://www.alhambra-patronato.es/fil...sa_nazar__.pdf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
I personally feel this is a 19th century blade that has been refurbished in the 20th century. I feel this was because of certain patina inconsistencies throughout the various materials found on this knife...at the very least I personally consider the grips and hammered bronze work to be of the 20th century.
Gavin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|