![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
Many scabbards are made out of two hollowed shells of wood bound together. But in SE Asia (elsewhere, too?) we encounter a different concept as well. The most obvious are the open-sided sheaths, and I think they may fit in here somewhere, but they're not what I'm writing about. I'm writing about sheaths with one hollowed shell, and the other side (always, AFAIK, the back) a flat board. This is common with the chisel ground blades of the Visayan Sea, though it is also common for them to come in "ordinary" two-shell sheaths. It seems related to having a long tail beyond the blade cavity on one (front) side only. It, or its features, are sometimes seen on centrally bevelled swords, as with my mysterious t-pommelled sword, whose sheath seems (can't really see the wood at the throat though) to be centrally hollowed (?) but has a long pronounced one-sided tail. Another example is my recently acquired matulis-hilted scramasax; wedge-section blade in a sheath that is basically hollowed on one side only (some on the other, perhaps for fine fitting, as I have had to do under similar circumstances; but only about 10% to the back; 90% to the front.). Thoughts? Examples? Questions? Answers?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,287
|
![]()
Less work for the craftsman ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
It is a little now, with the flat board being the basic unit of wood (though you have to remove the same amount of wood to form the cavity for the blade, either way), but for a traditional carver proceeding from maybe even picking and felling a tree, much less-so; it's not a lot harder to initially make the scooped out shape than a flat one; really superflat is actually one of the harder things to do with just knives and chisels. So, how does the timeline go on these? Is it the older way left over from ancestral chisel bevelled blades in some areas where it gets paired to centrally bevelled ones? Or is it newer, growing out of sawmills and flat boards? Don't ask me; I dunno. The scramasax is decently old, as is my mystery slasher (you know how I am about chopping
![]() Last edited by tom hyle; 23rd April 2005 at 08:54 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
|
![]()
Hi Tom,
Didn't we hit this before here? I agree that it's easier to hollow out one side in a two-piece wood scabbard. It's also safer, in that the edge of the blade hits wood, rather than hitting the gap between two pieces of wood, where it might cut its way out. I think that there are some other reasons for the one piece, open scabbards, that we talked about before. They're easier to clean out (you can scrub out the gunk that would accumulate in a closed scabbard). They're also good for showing off the size of one's blade. What I'd like to see is an open face scabbard that isn't mated with a beveled edge blade. Simply for safety's sake, I think a beveled edge is a better design when there's only a single slat of wood and several straps holding it on. I still think it's a fun topic though. Fearn Last edited by fearn; 23rd April 2005 at 09:08 PM. Reason: fixing typo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
Haven't checked your link yet, but I will. Just wanted to add that, though actually not with these two, the board-back(?) talibon sheaths often have the flat back end just above the end of the cavity; perhaps to provide for easy cleaning and/or drainage.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
|
![]()
Fearn, that was the hollow-back-no-front sheaths; now I wonder about the (possibly related) flat-back-hollow-front sheaths.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|