![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
![]()
I just acquired this interesting machete sword and I think it could be WW2 Philippine ; I usually think of these type of converted machetes as being African, so if someone told me it was I wouldn't be shocked.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,732
|
![]()
I think that it is indeed an African machete, nothing let me think that it is from the Philippines. I have seen this UK machete blades with many different fittings and so far I know this or similar blades still in production but unsure about this.
![]() Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
![]()
Yes, I was kind of afraid of that; the seller swore that his father brought it back from the Philippines .It's not the first time that I've been told disinformation, but it's all part of the game.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
Yes, I also don't think this is Filipino but African.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
![]()
As to the date of the blade, after doing a quick internet search, "Robert Mole and Sons," made blades 1875-1879, 1880-1881, & 1894 ; this is "Sons," not to confused with "Robert Mole," or "Robert Mole and Son."
Any ideas on how old and where from Africa it came from ? Could it be Haitian? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
|
![]()
I think it's a British issue machete blade that was remounted. The expanded tip bears strong similarities to issue machetes I've seen.
The mounts have a Philippine "feel" to me, circa 1940's, but the leatherwork with the tassels and tooling looks Mexican or Central American. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
Although "& sons" was a 19th century version company name,. What was actually stamped on the weapons & tools didn't always match, the continually changing company names. Mole registered the Steamer Trade Mark in 1886 and used it up to November 1920 . Looking at the font ,Id guess the early 20th century seems likely. ![]() These machetes were common in West Africa & the Caribbean & often "customised" in both areas... spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
I would just add to Spiral's comment that these "modified" machetes were indeed common in the West Indies, and I have several with Island names stamped into the leather sheaths (Trinidad, Tobago, Jamaica, etc.). The tassels and other decorations on the sheath of this one remind me of the West Indies examples I have seen.
Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
I am sure weve all realised , but no ones mentioned it yet, the scabbard is probably at least 80 years younger than the blade....
spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,200
|
![]()
The scabbard could be from the Americas and the piece got reheated, which it looks. Again not Filipino though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,287
|
![]()
Agree with Ian; I think it's probably West Indies/S. American .
![]() The hilt is also recognized as a Figa; a popular Brazilian charm . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
![]()
The "figa charm," motif held promise until I look it up ; a "figa fist," will have the thumb tucked under the forefinger .The fist that I have is clenching a bar,with tacks that could be interpreted in the shape of a cross.
The scabbard, although newer than the blade does have age and it is very well made; the cloth portion on the bottom is canvas; maybe this is to allow the blade to breathe or maybe it has some talismanic value. I think the key to identification is the fist. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
I must agree that this is most likely an African piece. The clenched fist was a common symbol used there as a sign of resistance and defiance just as it was in many countries other than the Philippines. The only thing that even looks remotely Philippine to me is the general styling of the leather sheath, but with the use of the brass eyelets, the manner in which the belt loops are attached and the tooling I think that the sheath was made post WWII and most likely somewhere south of the border as a replacement.
Best, Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
![]()
I can't disagree with anything you say except the eyelets on the scabbard could be plastic, but I think they are bone and purely for ornamentation; there is nothing but stitching holding the sheath together, no brass. The belt loop is more like a bayonet frog and it is a separate piece, cleverly going through a loop on the backside, 2 fingers back, one forward (sorry better pictures would have shown that).
I don't know where it came from or how old, but it's well made. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
|
![]() Quote:
I'm not sure if there is necessarily any direct link here, but I find it worth mentioning. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,217
|
![]()
Very interesting ; was this strictly 19th Century Mexican or also Colonial Spanish ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 363
|
![]()
It's hard for me to say. I have not made a study of earlier objects. The holsters were just adjuncts to a few revolvers I have either seen or owned over the years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() spiral |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: musorian territory
Posts: 415
|
![]()
its form the Caribbean.. they can come with a hand a boot a rooster or a dogs head.. ..
generally the nonspanish speaking areas prefer these styles.. in Jamaica theyll call it a cutlass the spanish style tooled sheaths are typical but ive seen wooden ones.. atleast for tourist items.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,287
|
![]()
Aha, another vote for West Indies .
I'm not alone . ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,781
|
![]()
Yeah, that fist is common to West Africa. Often with the thumb poking out between the forefinger and the ring finger.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Because the ancestors of a substantial fraction of the West Indies' population came from Africa, and the West Indies were a British possession, does it not seem most logical to think this machete came from the West Indies? This would explain the apparent African motifs as well as why an English machete came to have this hilt.
Furthermore, we know of several examples of fist-hilted Mole machete blades of the same shape that came from the W.I. and wore similar leather sheaths. While more complicated explanations are always possible, a W.I. origin seems the simplest and most compelling to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|