![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 459
|
![]()
Ming late dynasty Chinese Dao (Saber)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 910
|
![]()
Following Peter Dekker's article this looks most like a "goose quill saber" with a simplified "goose wing" termination. Hopefully Peter and Phillip will weigh in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
Seems unusual to see tunkou on one of these, but clearly this is a hybrid as so often the case with these forms. While I am anxious to see the input from Philip and Peter, I wanted to add my own similar example for perspective.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France
Posts: 206
|
![]()
Hi Antony and others,
I think i know that one... Honestly, it looks like a Yanchidao (goose wing) saber. Potentially, fittings are a bit later from blade. Some excavated swords from that type avec been attributed to 14th (Yuan period). I have discussed that one with Peter and Philip some months or year ago. It could be from late ming/early qing dynasty. At the same period, i had also contacted a chinese author and sword collector that assessed late ming/qing. Still, it could also be a bit later. It's always difficult to know. I think that saying 18th would be a reasonnable guess ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 459
|
![]() Quote:
Could be and also I was told that iron fitting is usually earlier than 19th/20th century. This is one of my favorite. Enjoy the photo. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Blade shape is usually called fengchidao (phoenix wing saber). The type does indeed date back to the Ming if not earlier, as indicated by depiction in art of the era, and a few surviving specimens. The fittings on this one look like later replacements, Qing for sure, judging from their style, probably around the 18th cent.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|