17th April 2021, 10:33 PM | #91 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 370
|
Thank you! The hanging ring (or lack thereof) is an important part of the scabbard design. But the back of the scabbard is not often seen in the photo.
|
20th April 2021, 03:27 PM | #92 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
1. to protect the clothes when on display for offical celebrations and occassions 2. support carrying plural weapons ( pistols, bichaqs and yataghans) 3. provide support and relief of the total weight 4. comfort when riding a horse ( and avoid risk losing a valuable weapon) @Detlef: see, a nice example of a yataghan without the fancy decoration of coral and stones but simple handle of metal and bone only Last edited by gp; 20th April 2021 at 06:56 PM. |
|
21st April 2021, 04:01 AM | #93 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,194
|
Quote:
|
|
21st April 2021, 08:58 PM | #94 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
it could well be an ivory one. If your expertise determines it as ivory I shall not contradict. Most of the Balkan yataghans (this one is from Dalmatia) were made from buffalo or ox bone but a few of ivory. My knowledge of the latter is very limited. Indeed quite some craftmanship on the leather but that has a long tradition in that region ( as with their filigree) |
|
24th April 2021, 06:16 PM | #95 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
If it were not for the typical Balkan design of the hilt with brass inserts, then in the shape of the blade and fullers, I would have seen a Surmene knife. Last edited by Saracen; 24th April 2021 at 06:58 PM. |
|
27th April 2021, 11:13 AM | #96 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
And both of us might be wright and wrong as the determination of origin is indeed not based upon pure mathematical science, not being the same of or no deduction of certain region's characteristics. Please allow me to elaborate: it would be too simple to explain it by the interaction of people moving around in the Ottoman empire as blacksmith both in the Ottoman empire and in Europe as well, were neither well to do nor had the ambition or freedom to move around...even if they would wish to. In general they would earn a good living where they were in the 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th century. A small exception could however have caused this : between 1860 and 1878, also in 1918 the Ottoman empire was shaken and quite a lot of people moved, some forcibly (a form of ethnic cleansing) whilst others voluntarily moved from east to west and west to east; from the Balkans to the Ottoman / Turkish territory or vice versa as states were created in the Balkans Obviously talking with them their cultural heritage. So you can find in present Turkey quite a lot peoples from plural national backgrounds / roots (Bosnian but also Greek). And the otherway around from the Black Sea erea, so also the Surmene / Sürmene region folks might have or had moved to the Balkans and with the cold weapons tradition in Bosnia it was easy for a Blacksmith Master /Majster to fit in and perhaps occassionally produce such a dagger. Still it doesn not exclude that it is either a fake or a Surmene copy of a Bosniak of that time.... Although I know a lot about the "Bosniaks" you can never be sure but I was more than willing & prepared to take the risk and add it to my collection. As you said it has too many details which could place it in Bosnia....if not...hard luck but still a very nice dagger Thank you for your comment, which is highly appreciated and confirmed my thoughts as well : well done and my respect !!! Last edited by gp; 27th April 2021 at 03:57 PM. |
|
2nd May 2021, 06:55 PM | #97 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
Sometimes they have a very similar decor of the handle, but even the blade characteristic for of the surmene knife does not allow us to confidently determine their origin. It would be very interesting to know more about these similarities. Last edited by Saracen; 2nd May 2021 at 11:29 PM. |
|
2nd May 2021, 08:32 PM | #98 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
Most of my sources are from the former Yugoslavia / their successor states (Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia) also Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey... but unfortunately the attention ( also by the Anglo-Saxon and German / Austrian authors of cold weapons ) focusses more to the "big" and more fancy ones likes yataghans and hardly or to a lesser degree on these kind of knives (bichaq in Turkish, kama and cakija in Slav languages). 90% of my info dates from publications between 1880 to 1980 and a few are recent ones but sadly nothing new or more on these types of "potential" cross-over ...and contacting folks in the mentioned regions does not result in much new info on the smaller knives... Even authorities like Vejsil Ćurčić ( around the 1920ies) , Marija Šercer (around the 1970ies) and Tarik Kožo (around 2010ies) do not go into that detail sadly... Last edited by gp; 2nd May 2021 at 09:38 PM. |
|
2nd May 2021, 08:52 PM | #99 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
to add more to the above, the newest cousin in my "Bosanceros"☺ collection.
Although it doesn't have the yataghan-like ears or curl with stubs which in combination with the bone handle and circular ornament are typical Bosnian, this one has a "flat"end of the handle as one sees with more Ottoman cold weapons but due to the handle's details ( red stone and circular ornament ) is certainly Bosnian.. The blade is 20 cm long and the writing in silver is 18.. and could be Sarajevo. It is made prior the Habsburg occupation I believe from around 1850 -1870. Sadly no scabbard... Last edited by gp; 2nd May 2021 at 09:48 PM. |
2nd May 2021, 09:35 PM | #100 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
this one, with scabbard and blade 17 cm Sarajevo 1887 written in silver, looks like the white bone version of Gonzoadler's green one
Last edited by gp; 2nd May 2021 at 09:49 PM. |
8th May 2021, 10:40 PM | #101 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
although I do not prefer damaged daggers, an exception if one stumbles on something rare or not often found like this Bosnian dagger
lenght dagger 20,8 cm Blade : 11 cm handle made from horn silver one-sided writting Foca 1890 sadly one circular ornament missing and a small horn piece as well the rarity for me is the Foca name and unyataghan-like form of the top of the handle . What are your thoughts ? Should I also repair the missing piece of horn ? Last edited by gp; 9th May 2021 at 08:09 AM. |
22nd May 2021, 12:58 PM | #102 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
notwithstanding the enormous response ....
I decided to leave it as it was and not to repair the broken part by filling / replacing the hole by new horn material. Another nice Bosnian bichaq, pre Habsburg era is this one with a leather strap, 29 cm long Last edited by gp; 22nd May 2021 at 03:15 PM. |
22nd May 2021, 12:59 PM | #103 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
some more pics. What do you think about this bichaq ?
|
23rd May 2021, 03:45 PM | #104 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
Why do you think your knife is Bosnian? I have a small book about Balkan knives. It is a nice book but 20% of the knives published are not from the Balkans, they are Turkish, Kurdish and North Africans. Be carefull your post is turning like the Omani khanjar thread: a catamonologue or a monocatalogue... Kind regards, Kubur |
|
24th May 2021, 06:34 PM | #105 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
Why my friend?
Simple: based upon literature I quoted and my knowledge... Before I joined this forum, to my big surprise, concering Bosnian cold weapons, I only read "I think" ....but hardly any comments based upon knowledge... Nothing of books and publications like the ones I quoted ( between 1880 to the present day). Try Kozo (270 pages and published in 2010! and in English...). If you would have consulted Kozo and the by my quoted sources, you would have known the answer and not have come up with a premature assumption... Just check my contributions and the literature I mention. One might learn a little bit FYI: many publications are not only from the former Yu(goslavia) but also Bulgaria and Romania. A lot in English but when not, the pics and name "Bosna" will tell you the answer.Even the ones in cyrillic... Also the much refered Elgood here...got most of his Balkan knowledge from a Serbian lady who was and still is leading when it comes down to Balkan cold weapons knowledge: she wrote 3 books! Guess a few to no one here know her name To give you one criterium: the decoration on top of the blade... But obviously that's not the only one, more criteria are present... My knowledge on other arms is virtually zero, so I do cherish and treasure the comments as I do learn a lot but on Bosnian cold weapons I dare say few here can match my knowledge. No disrespect intended My intentions were pure; to share my knowledge and educate folks here. If that offends you, I am sorry and apologize for that inconvenience and shall refrain from entering further comments and leave it gladly up to you and other big shots to advise and judge on Balkan arms ☼☺☼ Nema problema as they say in Bosna Last edited by gp; 24th May 2021 at 07:28 PM. |
24th May 2021, 08:08 PM | #106 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
But we are all the same and a forum is for discussion. Being from Bosnia or the Balkans doesn't make you more knowledgeable than others. Quote:
It's a nice book but as I said 20% of the knives are not from the Balkans. So if it is your reference then you might be mistaken. Quote:
So as you wrote, your knowledge on other arms is virtually zero... My friendly advice would be: read on other countries otherwise all you will see in the Balkans will be from the Balkans... Many Russians and Caucasians are doing the same mistake. |
|||
24th May 2021, 09:37 PM | #107 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
again stop assuming & judging prematurely Nor do you comment the other books and publications I mentioned ... Pick out 1 item to prove you're correct. Nice discussion technique for discrediting some one (actually 1 of the 9 manipulation techniques in psychology) but doesn't impress me ... I leave the stage to you if that makes you feel good and a big boy |
|
25th May 2021, 01:28 AM | #108 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,217
|
Guys I'm going to stop this right here.
It is one thing to debate the issues, it is another to get nasty and overreact. We are moving in that direction so I will call for a break and take a breath. Going any further in personal attacks or responses will bring consequences............ Thank you. |
25th May 2021, 08:52 PM | #109 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
It is always very interesting and useful to learn new things from a person who is specially and in depth dealing with a certain narrow topic, and it would probably be very good if the discussions in your topics were more active. I will venture give the conversation some impetus: I think that the decoration of the scabbard and handle of this knife a typical for Bosnian bichak zigzag hatching may refer it to this family. |
|
30th June 2021, 07:53 PM | #110 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
a nice piece of hand craft and art is this filigree (sterling) dagger belt buckle I recently purchased.
From filigree perspective it looks like Dalmatian, Bosnian or Montenegrin. Also similar like the type of sterling brooch I found in Sarajevo, Kotor or Dubrovnik in the 1980ies . This one looks the same, although the brooches were without the 2 dots on the grip. Looking close at the silver dots on the "bichaq" they might indicate as well a Caucasian origin like the grip of a kama / shalta / khanjali ...but these again do not have the curved blade as the Balkan bichaq or Ottoman handzjar... the dots could also be functional as a kind of support / firmness (which makes sense...) Still a nice piece of art dating back to a wide period of 1880-1960 to hang above the Bosnian kama, bichaq and yataghan |
1st July 2021, 11:59 AM | #111 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Germany
Posts: 244
|
Hello,
I think the miniature dagger of the belt is not a Kama or Khanjar, I would say it is a Bebut. These daggers are similar to Kamas and Kindjals, but they have a curved blade. Regards Robin |
1st July 2021, 03:05 PM | #112 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 1,042
|
Quote:
But there were buckles just like yours: https://www.vitber.com/lot/31228 Dagger - "bebut" |
|
1st July 2021, 06:31 PM | #113 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
Guess they all are 84 zolotniki? And guess I must now buy a Russian dagger to go with it…. bozje moj….again spending money...dawaij dawaij, pasjli pasjli ….:-) Question for advice: I found this description: "Bebut – curve Caucasian dagger, which became widely known in the early 20th century, when it was adopted by the Russian army. The dagger is different curved shape and large size. The origin of the dagger . Curved blades – the hallmark of the East. And bebut is no exception, since it is originally a traditional Caucasian dagger. The name of the blade “bebut” comes from the Turkic word, which means “thigh”. It’s hard to say when the story of this dagger began. It was spread only in the early twentieth century, when it became part of the armament of the Russian army. Presumably, the “ancestor” of the blade of such a shape is a curve or Persian Ottoman dagger. In the late 19th century dagger Bebut was in use among the Cossacks. If the flat dagger was armed with all without exception, the curved blade was chosen by the scouts, since the thin and long blade provided the convenience of carrying a cold weapon in any situation. Bebut is officially known since 1840 as part of the uniform of the Kuban Cossacks, but its history is much older. In General, earlier called the Bebut any dagger with a curved end on the blade, while now under this name is understood as “Bebut” model 1907. Bebut in the Russian army Cossack Bebut came into the Russian army in 1907. At this time there is a need for more weapons to replace the authorized artillery pieces. A knife with Bebut was easier to wield than a sword, besides, its form is considerably easier. In the first years of the Bebut armed with only the higher ranks, but beginning in 1909 artillery Bebut was made available to all military. Despite the lack of tradition use daggers in Russian army, curved blade quickly became an indispensable part of weaponry. In subsequent years, on the choice of this dagger did not have to regret, because the curved blade proved itself as a cutting, chopping and as a weapon. This is due to the peculiarities of the blade, its shape and methods of sharpening." My question concerns the mentioning of the Kuban Cossacks: would this dagger thus be different from the dagger of the Zaporozhian Cossacks? If so: what dagger would the Zaporozhian Cossacks have and use ? Last edited by gp; 1st July 2021 at 09:07 PM. |
|
3rd July 2021, 07:03 PM | #114 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Posts: 82
|
Here is one to add for the records, acquired a few weeks ago from a friend.
-Geoff |
3rd July 2021, 11:32 PM | #115 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 370
|
One of the most interesting knives I've seen in the past few years.
|
4th July 2021, 03:05 AM | #116 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,217
|
Gents, I love the belt buckles!
And that bichaq - Beautiful! Stunning! Is the hilt made of ivory and the scabbard silver"? And by the way, if you ever want to throw this away please let me know (I'll now go back to hiding behind the trash cans ) Last edited by Battara; 5th July 2021 at 06:58 PM. |
7th July 2021, 09:45 PM | #117 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
Quote:
looks quite similar like this Bosnian one: http://vikingsword.com/vb/showpost.p...8&postcount=67 |
|
8th July 2021, 04:08 AM | #118 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,217
|
Upon closer inspection the material looks like really good quality bone and beautifully carved!
|
2nd April 2022, 08:37 PM | #119 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
a new addition to my collection but a strange one :
first the year 1879: 1 year after the conquering and annexation of Bosnia by Habsburg...not often seen Secondly the style of the blade is more like the Ottoman yataghan (a wave-like type) compared to the later more dagger-like type ( almost European) Third., the hilt, handle which has no similarity with the yataghan types ( sadle, ears, etc) but looks more like the joint-end of a bone being carved in a fancy "animalistic" decorated way...(?); never seen something like this but that doesn't mean anything... Last but not least the decoration on the hilt / handle / grip clearly differs from other types which can be seen here in several threads.( with the exception of the 2 circles) Have you seen or met this type before ? Do you have one in your collection? Can you advise or have knowledge about this one ? Last edited by gp; 2nd April 2022 at 09:25 PM. |
2nd April 2022, 08:40 PM | #120 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 717
|
and the last pics .
what do you think ? Might it be a local trying to be creative, an apprentice first trying his skills or somethin else...? I honestly wouldn't know but think it interesting nevertheless Last edited by gp; 2nd April 2022 at 08:57 PM. |
|
|