![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,653
|
![]()
Just to 'echo' Jim's sentiments....It's been great to see such collaboration and community spirit ......keep up the good work guys
![]() All the best David |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Yep, I agree Katana. It is fun!
BTW G, just polished a small section of the cross-guard, the yellowish tinge was indeed due to patina/oily residues. The hilt is made of white metal. Take care y'all : ) M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Bloody hell! Well there's a suprise! I'll let our friend know. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
G,
I so much envy your access to civilized museums... ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
![]() But, they are State museums, so they do 'belong' to the people ![]() As a socialist, I'd be horrified if they wouldn't help a polite request ![]() I've emailed our Kind Curator to tell her that yours is white metal, and I'll let you know as soon/if she comes up with anything more. Gene |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 51
|
![]()
Trawlling through the oldsword.com database (looking for something entirely different!) I came accross this one. The Hilt is virtually identical to the sword discussed here (without the portcullis shell guard), but made by Wilkinson. This example is dated 1853. I'm starting to think of this sword as a 'presentation' blade', similar to private purchase poignards awarded for civillian and military service or excellence.
Item Description (Item Id: 22764) ANTIQUE 1853 WILKINSON PRESENTATION SWORD A very unusual and possibly unique sidearm made by Henry Wilkinson and etched on the blade :PRESENTED TO JAMES MONROE BY THE COMPANY JUNE 1853.As there is no reference to the presenter other than the company.it was possibly given by Wilkinsons, to someone conected with them.I have never seen one like it. There are similarities to the military band swords of the period, and it is reminicant of a Royal Scottish Archers sword I once owned a few years ago.The overall length is 26 inches, and the blade is 19 1/2 inches. The fittings are nickle and the grip is rayskin bound with wire.The scabard is leather with nickle mounts.the overall condition is nice,the blade retaining a good polish,with some light staining but no pitting. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]()
Hi guys,
Bryan, your finding is (again) crucial. Indeed, it is the same sword. Mine has a loose shell-guard, not fixed to the cross. The date can now be estimated on a definite basis. Spanish officer swords from 1860 have similar-looking fish-skin grips, plus german ceremonial swords from the late XIX and early XX Cs have similar end points. That was the base for my dating, which now seems +/- right. Still, the four columned portcullis in the shield may have some bearing on our blade's final identity. BTW, does anyone have an image of the ricasso's mark for the retailers "E.Woods & Son Bow St Covent Garden" ? G,. at least your curators answer Qs. : ) Our local equivalents feel threatened by Qs, and defend the secrecy of their armamentariums to the death. Apparently, their only chance to feel the trappings of power is when denying access to their "wards". We call their type "avocados with ties". To add insult to injury, they don't take good care of the collections. Excuse me for seething... In the local settings, I actively discourage anyone from donating any historical piece to the govt. Private parties take so-much better care of their collections. Best regards to all, and an interesting Samhain tomorrow.... Manolo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
The 1853 date of Bryans example fits perfectly with the 'gladius' sized/shaped fashion in military swords, so I'd say you've now got a definate 'mid' 19thC date for yours. As for museum curators, it's suprising to hear that yours are like 'that' ![]() Also rather depressing! I'm happy to say that I've always found the museums of the UK to be quite the opposite. Somtimes they don't manage to ID things, but they are usually happy to try. I mean the occasional request of course, not a free valuation and ID service (There are auction houses for that! LOL). Occasionally I will contact a museum as a last resort. It's going to be something pretty obscure if I do, so I guess they can see I'm not walking in with something they see very often. I'm actually trying to ID a pair of bronze age/roman British bronze bowls at the moment, somewhat unsuccessfully I might add. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,592
|
![]()
Hi,
Came across some information which may put this to rest i.e. a dealers website with the same item and described as a sword of the Queen's Westminster Rifles. See attached photo of their regimental cap badge. Regards, Norman. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|