![]() |
![]() |
#31 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
Sadley never had one, seen 2 in small UK auctions in the last 14 years, but one was before the kukris , so I couldn't bid high enough & the other time it was after the kukris & Id spent my money. Looking back I should have got the Dha... The kukri were good , but A dha like that is special I think. Sounds like you love that 1242 Chulasakarat dha, for a senior person then if thin light & razor sharp! {Not to mention a gold inlay.} No utility work for that one! Have you any links or good pics of the one with crystalline structure to share? It would be fascinating to see. spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
Jonathan, the blade on that dated dha is really special. The fittings are pedestrian, and the scabbard that appeared with it in the Oldman catalog is long-gone, but doesn't look particularly fancy or highly decorated.
Perhaps a master swordsman? The body-guard of a wealthy individual? A professional dueler? Soldier? We are only limited by our imagination. ![]() Parenthetically, I have not been able to find anything significant about that 1880 date in Burma. It was during the reign of Burma's last monarch, Thibaw, and five years prior to the third Anglo-Burmese war and Burma's annexation by Britain. I have never been able to capture the "pattern" in the crystalline-structured dha, but haven't tried with a modern hi-res digital camera recently. I know you're familiar with the difficulty--tilting the blade 'just so' in certain lighting and the pattern becomes visible. ![]() Best, A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Interesting stuff Andrew, Great to have found it in Oldmans.
If you ever "catch" it in a photo it would be nice to see. Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
As Dha,Dah etc. means knife Id guess, It was a correct after all? ![]() spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]()
Andrew, I can not bring to light any detail about your dated sword but there are others with the same blade types and markings known, also in basic dress....a reader here has shared one with me and other members...perhaps it will find its way to these pages when a new home has been found for it...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
Id guess as in that era as England ruled half of of Africa, the Caribbean & Asia as well & exports as well as imports were key {as always..} many were probably sold, particularly to the major oil,teak,rubber,opium,sugar,corn,coffee, ruby, gold silver diamond & safari type companies Id guess. ![]() Id also surmise the published prices were for anyone that daft to pay them..... If you wanted a few hundred , every couple of yearsI bet you could get them for peanuts... {Particularly if you went to the same school or belonged to the same club.} They would cost more than the local produce for sure, but of a consistent style & steel. {And good for business. ![]() Spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Spiral:
I think we need to look at the Oldman's catalog with a critical eye as to the attributions of the items shown as Burmese. While it is possible that these may have been found and brought back to England from Rangoon or Mandalay, a number of them are not typical of Burmese work (and by Burmese I mean produced in Burma for the indigenous population). While it was common practice that conquering armies would bring back craftsmen from their conquered territories to continue their fine crafts in a new home, it takes some time for the new arts and crafts to be assimilated into a new culture. For example, when the Thai conquered Laos and brought back Lao craftsmen, it took some time to assimilate the longer hilted Lao daab into an accepted Thai form. So there has been a long history of diffusion of styles over time. That said, there appear to be some inaccuracies in the Oldman catalog. Looking at the image below, and starting from the top, number 10 has an unusually long hilt for a Burmese dha and is more likely Thai. Numbers 2 and 3 are Shan/Thai work and either from the Shan States (partly in Burma) or southern Yunnan. Number 5 could also be Thai. Number 4 we can probably say with some confidence is not Burmese, but more likely northern Thai/Lao in origin and perhaps coming from one of the hill tribes (Montagnard) of that region given the unusual shape of the tip. Which brings us to number 12, the one that resembles the item labeled Burmese dha in the Hunt & Sons catalog. As Gavin rightly points out, this resembles a common tool used in Thailand. I don't know if it is used in Burma these days, but I did not see it there 25 years ago. It is not used as a knife but is more like a short handled axe, primarily for chopping bamboo and even not-so-small trees. Some of the modern versions come with a hollow handle to mount the blade on a pole. One name for this tool is e-toh and there is a version made by the Aranyik company. These show up regularly on eBay. I don't believe that the locals would classify this tool as a dha, and I have never heard it referred to as a "knife." My last word on the William Hyde and Sons products in SE Asia. In my 50+ years of traveling in various parts of mainland SE Asia, Indonesia and the Philippines, I have not come across any of these items. I have seen other brands of European-made machetes and tools, just none from this particular company. That's not to say they weren't there at some time. Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | ||||||||||||||||||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Why Rangoon & Mandalay Ian? England ruled India at that time, & Burma was classed as part of India at that time. It could have been collected anywhere in Burma, after we had spent many years conquering them it was all British. The weapons, the teak, the opium, the oil the rubies, the tigers etc.etc. {Shades of the King & I!} Quote:
mmm Indigenous population of Burma is an interesting statement.... Who was indigenous when? Same as the USA, Australia or even the UK. Not many country's where humans truly originated,, history isn't like that, it appears we all spread out across the world from Africa according to modern research. So in modern parlance I think the word indigenous, does need a dating factor added. I would say Burma has a complex history of wars & indeed used to rule Thailand/Siam , at one point for a couple of hundred years I think? It has 135 recognised ethnic groups of people living there {According to the Burmese government.} & that not even including domiciled Gurkhas of 4 & 5 generations born there & very other groups , such as Anglo Burmese who have probably lived there even longer! & Numerous others not counted as indigenous. Quote:
![]() Quote:
So lets break down your step by step opinions on these inaccuracies you describe. Ive added past quotes by Mark Bowditch {Auther of Dha Research Index} about the exact same weapons from the Oldman catalogue.. .................................................. .................................................. ...... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
See tribal map attached. Turquoise areas are shan... Quote:
I agree with Mark here, its highly likely to be Burmese shan, As I showed in pictures early in this thread shan style weapons were in common use even among the Kachin & Burma rifles units. .................................................. .................................................. ...... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Or as Gavin also put it. Quote:
Quote:
Ahh yes me bad... I should have said Dha-ma, apparently that's how the locals classify it. ![]() They also come in much smaller sizes. Not all large things for chopping bamboo. I recall Gavin had a very small one. . Quote:
Your last word? OK. ![]() I hope you at least found the pictures of Kachin troops with shan Dah & the video of the Burma rifles using, issue "Chindit" dha, as well as more ethnographic looking arms of both Kachin & Shan styles in use, making punji stakes. Interesting at least? ![]() I am sure there must be many more pics out there. I have an Anglo Burmese friend {Also a kukri collector.} from a long line of very senior Burma military police ,I ve not even asked about this yet. You were very lucky to spend 50 years traveling the Orient... for many people that's the stuff dream lives are made off. ![]() As for the fact you didn't see them there 25 years ago guess most 50 or 100 year old Dha-ma in Burma would have long since been battered to bits by the locals? ![]() As an addendum. Here another example shared on this forum in the past by. dennee These are in the Pitt-Rivers Museum in Oxford. The label reads "Varieties of the Burmese da for various uses. Pres[ente]d by Capt. R.C. Temple R.E., 1889." Photo of display attached below. Your reply to dennee was... Quote:
4 are clearly of this style, 2 of them only have the exact hilt you described at the start of this thread re. my posting of the William Hyde and Sons {Better of course known as Brades.{& about 20 other names}} as.... Quote:
I realise not all collectors & researcher's agree with one another, But It seem such tools/weapons as the Burmese Dha ma were in usage in Burma a C.100 years ago. Which is probably why British companies made & no doubt exported them. spiral 2nd. addendum. Ian ,you missed out the one on that page of Oldmans that Mark, says defintly is not Burman. Dha No1. Quote:
"However, given the constant warfare between Burma and Thailand, it is not unreasonable to assume this one made its way into Burma as a spoil of war" I would have to agree with Marks reasoning there, even if any of the 5 listed as historical Burma brings backs listed in this thread, from old "at time" collections originated in Thailand, they were taken back & used there by "indigenous peoples!, who recognised & were familiar with them particlarily in the case of Dha-ma, as apart from a little handle styling {possibly? }there are identical to those regularly made & used in Burma by some of the 135 indigenous groups of people, 100 years ago. Spiral PS. Ian your posted picture of the Kachin rangers appears deleted from the outside host you listed it from. Can you re.list it please, so people can follow the thread properly. ![]() Last edited by spiral; 15th September 2014 at 03:29 PM. Reason: To get quotes in correct spacing...etc.etc. |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
Spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Spiral:
Work is keeping me very busy at the moment and I have not been able to spend as much time here as I would like. Your detailed responses to some of my comments would suggest that you are bothered by them, and I apologize if I have offended you in any way. I do not have the time to give your detailed replies the necessary attention they deserve right now, so I shall get back to you later this week. BTW, the photo link to which you refer seems to be working OK on my screen, so I'm not sure what the problem is. Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Ian I am not offended. ![]() Its just you drew so many points into your reason to distrust Oldman to enhance you stance & reinforce your statement that no such tool resembling the Burma Dha made by Brades was traditionally used in Burma. So I thought I would deal with each point as best I could. ![]() That's not an unusual thing for me to do....Ive done it before. So I was just trying to point out it seems from other evidence on the forum that the Brades style is a "traditional Burma dha" Although obviously should it be called the Dha-ma. It seems to me , it certainly existed in Burma long ago. So what with Marks comments & with your past comments re. the Dennee examples from the Pitt rivers collection which at least for the shorter handled "Burma dha handled" ones you accepted as Burmese rather than Thai. I thought that presented a good case? So I presented it.. Sorry if the detailed response to the numerous aside points you had drawn together, came across rude. I would have much rather just discussed the Kachin & Burma style designs , but as you drew others in to add weight to your argument I thought I should reply in full to each of those points. Re. your pic, it is just a red x for me. ![]() spiral Last edited by spiral; 17th September 2014 at 11:34 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
|
![]()
Some of the Shan States are not part of China due to colonial agreements between the British and Chinese. I'd also point out that the map does not show the Shan States or State singular these days, but a very generalized map of ethnic regions in Burma.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
Would the map have been more accurate tribally speaking 50 or 100 years ago? If not can provide a more accurate map particularilary of around 1900? Although for sake of knowledge a currant map would also be interesting to compare, how things have changed. Spiral Last edited by spiral; 19th September 2014 at 08:37 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
|
![]()
Spiral,
I know enough about cartography and the bewildering complexity that is/was/shall be Burma's ethnic mixture to know that vouching for the accuracy of any map, especially without explicit parameters laid out, is a fool's errand. Take for example the Shan States. Sounds easy enough to define but...well, like I said, a fool's errand. If you really are serious, I would suggest finding a copy of Martin Smith's "Burma: Insurgency and the Politics of Ethnicity" and read and chapters 2,3,5 and 16. It certainly won't answer your questions, but it is certainly more concise and informed answer than I'll ever be able to give you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: musorian territory
Posts: 415
|
![]() Quote:
you are confusing the amount fo wage earning people with.. increae in wages.. burma in the 1900s a burmese bureaucrat would have had a reasonably good income by local standards. far superior that what he same job would pay in today's standards. maybe 5 or 6 times higher.. so the beaurcracy and the upper classes had money to spend things were not all doom and gloo as the situation has been there slice 1948... rememebr burma was one of the most production portion of the british empire and the larges food producer in aisa.. so considering there were very few europeans living there the profit form a lot of the trade did go to local persons.. who would purchase things as they do.. now also consider something- people did full well understand that european blade steel was far superior to their own.. by virtue of correct hardening and heat treatment and lack of flaws in the blade.. correct steel ect.. so just as we like to buy new or interesting things or something different im sure then there would have been a customer or two as well.. if your a rich local and you see a native style of blade in a catalog but made in english.. why maybe youd be curious to try it.. and they did actually buy these things... i had in the past parang blades form 2 different british makers of a very high quality.. iim more than sure the volume would have been tiny.. as the purchase of european styles was in vouge with the rich, sabres .. small swords.. ect.. they had their local products made to their specific requirments......... being that mostly the european style weapons were by this time decorations.. unsuted for use as a real weapon.. more a status symbol to wear when you got a foto taken. im sure some fo these more functional native style tools were made... .. so im sure if we were able to find the records from these producers well see that they did indeed sell some of these.. im sure a small quantity but rich people liked to buy weapons in those days to arm their guards.. for them selves to collect ect. if you look at many catalogs form the 19th and 20th century form british india youll find a lot of this stuff in there.. marketed to all the rajahs .. and ill be sur ein burma malaya ect.. it was like that too... just on a small scale.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Ausjulius:
You are essentially making the same point that I was making. If you look at the last sentence that you quoted from my earlier post, "Even so, it is apparent that the cost of William Hunt & Sons' products would have been outside the range affordable for the average Burmese/Kachin consumer in 1900 or today"I was simply saying that the cost of these "luxury" items was way more than an ordinary Burmese person could afford in 1900 or today. That a few may have been sold to wealthier locals is certainly possible. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, the price is per dozen, but if one does the calculation of cost per item (including shipping to Burma from England), we come out with a number that would have been beyond that affordable by the average Burmese in the early 1900s or today. I did the calculations in post #13 of this thread. Ian. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
I think your still missing a major point Ian.
The massive Burmah oil, the teak, rubber, opium, sugar, tea, ruby, gold, silver, sapphire & rice industry,imports & exports were all English run & the major employment base in Burma. Many were among some of the largest company's in the world at that time. Such industry's were I believe highly likely to buy English goods, after all many Naga axe dha are clearly made from imported British hoe blades... so it seems likely that many other such tools would also be imported. spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Ausjulius and Spiral:
I really think we are agreed on the possible place these luxury goods might have had in Burmese society of 1900. As I noted in my original post: So who would have bought these expensive quality items in the colonies? Perhaps ex-patriots for employees on their plantations. Perhaps wealthy locals who had the money to buy them. But I doubt many would have found their way to the hill country where the largely untamed Kachin lived.I suppose poorer people in that time could have obtained these tools in much the same way the Naga obtained English-made hoes to create their dao, by appropriating them in the dark of night. Ian. Last edited by Ian; 3rd October 2014 at 03:44 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|