|
1st October 2008, 05:57 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
Hi all!
Back again :-) Could it be an east India Co piece? Its a nice 'stubby' little beast! Have you taken it to bits to search for hidden markings? Regards Gene |
1st October 2008, 07:14 AM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,739
|
Quote:
Is the stock British, and had an eastern barrel added at some later stage? The plot thickens! Regards Stuart |
|
1st October 2008, 01:38 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
Not Turkish, the stock is all wrong for them. And they are characteristically more decorated. Of course, that applies to the ones I have seen so far.
Perhaps there were exceptions, but this one doesn't feel Turkish at all... I read somewhere that europeans used brass blunderbusses, often at sea. They could only load lead shot, since anything else (as the stories went about stones, bolts, etc...) would destroy the softer barrel. Another advantage the significantly costlier barrels had was is that they didn't rust, and when they exploded from overuse or overload, they usually only deformed or split. OTOH, overstressed iron barrels would explode like a grenade And no, I haven't yet dismounted the lock. Will soon do. Toots : ) M |
1st October 2008, 07:35 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 2,739
|
I agree that this is not Turkish, but my suggestion was that POSSIBLY a British stock had been (re)mated with an eastern barrel, thereby creating a "kneepistol"
Regards S |
|
|